On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 09:33 -0400, Robert Wilton wrote:
> Hi Lada,
>
> On 16/07/2018 08:35, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > Robert Wilton writes:
> >
> > > Hi Kent,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure that sec 7.13.2 of 7950 allows refine to add a when
> > > statement, although an equivalent solution would be
So it seems that
grouping "bar-etc" {
uses "foo-bar-etc" {
refine "foo" {
if-feature never-supported-feature ;
}
}
}
would work. It seems rather similar to a deviation.
regards Balazs
On 7/16/2018 9:33 AM, Robert Wilton
w
Hi Lada,
On 16/07/2018 08:35, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Robert Wilton writes:
Hi Kent,
I'm not sure that sec 7.13.2 of 7950 allows refine to add a when
statement, although an equivalent solution would be refine it with an
if-feature statement for a feature that is never enabled.
Neither "when
Robert Wilton writes:
> Hi Kent,
>
> I'm not sure that sec 7.13.2 of 7950 allows refine to add a when
> statement, although an equivalent solution would be refine it with an
> if-feature statement for a feature that is never enabled.
Neither "when" nor "if-feature" is permitted as a substateme
On 2018-07-15 13:11, Robert Wilton wrote:
Hi Kent,
I don't think that this is a valid use of augment - I thought that augment can
only add news data nodes, not add extra sub statements to existing ones.
Well, it is valid (though not if "foo" is a leaf), but you are right,
and it doesn't do wh
Hi Kent,
I don't think that this is a valid use of augment - I thought that
augment can only add news data nodes, not add extra sub statements to
existing ones.
Also, YANG allows grouping to be changed so that it is constructed from
sub groupings, at long as the original grouping name is pre
Hi Rob,
Right you are, "refine" doesn't have a "when" substatement, but "augment" does.
grouping "bar-etc" {
uses "foo-bar-etc" {
augment "foo" {
when "false()";
}
}
}
The problem with splitting up groupings is that 1) it needs to be done
beforeh
Hi Kent,
I'm not sure that sec 7.13.2 of 7950 allows refine to add a when
statement, although an equivalent solution would be refine it with an
if-feature statement for a feature that is never enabled.
Ideally, I think that the groupings would be split up, so that they
build on each other.
Say there is:
grouping "foo-bar-etc" {
container-or-leaf "foo" { ... }
container-or-leaf "bar" { ... }
... // the "etc" ;)
}
And the goal is to use the grouping sans the "foo" node.
Can a "when" statement that always evaluates to "false"
do it?
grouping "bar-etc" {
uses
