de>
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de>; <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Instance-data-format - shall we define etag and
last-modified annotation ?
Hello,
As Jurgen, Andy, Lada and Joe is opposed to defining the annotations in the
instance model draft, and
From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: 23 July 2019 18:06
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Cc: Balázs Lengyel ; Andy Bierman
; Juergen Schoenwaelder
; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Instance-data-format - shall we define etag and
last-modified annotation ?
On Jul 23, 2019, at 18:01, Rob Wilton
t;> On
Behalf Of Balázs Lengyel
Sent: 23 July 2019 13:09
To: Andy Bierman mailto:a...@yumaworks.com>>; Juergen
Schoenwaelder
mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de>>;
netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Instance-data-format - shall we define etag and
be useful.
Thanks,
Rob
From: netmod On Behalf Of Balázs Lengyel
Sent: 23 July 2019 13:09
To: Andy Bierman ; Juergen Schoenwaelder
; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Instance-data-format - shall we define etag and
last-modified annotation ?
Hello,
As Jurgen, Andy, Lada and Joe is opposed
; unless people
speak up it is removed.
Regards Balazs
From: Andy Bierman
Sent: 2019. július 23., kedd 11:39
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder ; Balázs
Lengyel ; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Instance-data-format - shall we define etag and
last-modified annotation ?
On Tue, Jul 23
> The values are associated with a representation of a response
> to a request for some portion of the datastore contents. E.g., a
> representation in XML must be a different
> ETag than a JSON representation (of the exact same datastore contents).
AFAIK, this is not required, and definitely
; > Sent: 2019. július 22., hétfő 16:15
> > To: Balázs Lengyel
> > Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [netmod] Instance-data-format - shall we define etag and
> > last-modified annotation ?
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 07:23:59PM +, Balázs Lengyel wr
Sent: 2019. július 22., hétfő 16:15
> To: Balázs Lengyel
> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] Instance-data-format - shall we define etag and
> last-modified annotation ?
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 07:23:59PM +, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> &
Hello Jürgen,
Could the etag and last-modified annotations be moved to 6991bis?
Regards Balazs
-Original Message-
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
Sent: 2019. július 22., hétfő 16:15
To: Balázs Lengyel
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Instance-data-format - shall we define etag
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 07:23:59PM +, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Restconf (rfc8040) defined to useful bits of metadata about a YANG defined
> datastore: entity-tag and the last-modified timestamp.
>
> These can be very useful in instance data sets, however Restconf defines an
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
