On 06/20/2015 12:25 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
Ok, how would all of this tie together with flex and bison that we
use for trafgen as parser generator? It looks on a first glance that
this design would be outside of that scope?
.
You mean that this is out of scope of this thread which was relat
On 06/20/2015 12:38 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
Regarding cleanups ... what do you think about change pcap_pkthdr_t to:
typedef struct {
union {
struct pcap_pkthdr ppo;
struct pcap_pkthdr_ns ppn;
struct pcap_pkthdr_ll
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:27:41AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 06/20/2015 12:16 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:12:06AM +0300, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:59:32PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >>>On 06/19/2015 11:37 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> ...
On 06/20/2015 12:16 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:12:06AM +0300, Vadim Kochan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:59:32PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/19/2015 11:37 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
by adding "|| linktype == LINKTYPE_LINUX_SLL)" I got dissected Netlink
mes
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:16:54PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 06/19/2015 10:46 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> ...
> >OK here is another (may be better) design.
> >
> >Here is an example of the cfg script:
> >
> >{
> > eth
> > {
> > dst: eth_addr(AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF)
> > pro
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:12:06AM +0300, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:59:32PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On 06/19/2015 11:37 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> > ...
> > >Never applied patches from emails, I tried to do in mutt by saving as
> > >attachments or mbox, I even cut ti
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:59:32PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 06/19/2015 11:37 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> ...
> >Never applied patches from emails, I tried to do in mutt by saving as
> >attachments or mbox, I even cut till 'diff' line but with no luck to
> >apply this. May be you can suggest
On 06/19/2015 11:48 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:13:54PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/19/2015 10:58 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
...
@@ -737,6 +837,24 @@ static inline void pcap_validate_header(const stru
On 06/19/2015 11:37 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
Never applied patches from emails, I tried to do in mutt by saving as
attachments or mbox, I even cut till 'diff' line but with no luck to
apply this. May be you can suggest some work flow with mutt for
patches via email ?
Ok, so here's both as an
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:13:54PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 06/19/2015 10:58 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> ...
> >>@@ -737,6 +837,24 @@ static inline void pcap_validate_header(const struct
> >>pcap_filehdr *hdr)
> >>if (
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 06/18/2015 11:49 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >On 06/18/2015 11:42 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:45:29AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >>>I've started splitting this into smaller digestible chunks,
> >>
On 06/19/2015 10:46 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
...
OK here is another (may be better) design.
Here is an example of the cfg script:
{
eth
{
dst: eth_addr(AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF)
proto: ipv4,
}
ip
{
src: ip_addr(192.168.1.1)
dst: ip_addr(192.1
On 06/19/2015 10:58 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
...
@@ -737,6 +837,24 @@ static inline void pcap_validate_header(const struct
pcap_filehdr *hdr)
if (unlikely(hdr->version_minor != PCAP_VERSION_MINOR) &&
_
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 06/18/2015 11:49 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >On 06/18/2015 11:42 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:45:29AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >>>I've started splitting this into smaller digestible chunks,
> >>
On 06/18/2015 11:49 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 06/18/2015 11:42 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:45:29AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
I've started splitting this into smaller digestible chunks,
couple of more evenings and it should be done from my side.
Thanks for your pat
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:08:57AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 06/18/2015 03:24 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:07:12AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >>On 06/18/2015 10:57 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> >>...
> >>>Not yet, but I will try keep thinking about this, and will
16 matches
Mail list logo
