In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please do not email us log files from crashed sessions of NetSurf with
> zero context. We did not request the log, as suggested in your
> subject line, nor any of the previous dozen. It is not helpful in the
I sus
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Jess Hampshire wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please do not email us log files from crashed sessions of NetSurf with
zero context. We did not request the log, as suggested in your
subject line, nor any of the previou
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tricia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28 Jul, in article
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Moore
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 28 Jul 2008, Tricia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm fairly sure I did know how to alter the default size of the
> > > window in NetSu
Are there any plans (or timescale) to add support for scroll bars on
embedded objects?
I'm currently developing a website for a client, and I'm using the
tag instead of frames. Whilst it 'almost' works on NetSurf, there is no
scrollbar so you can't read the bottom.
Example at http://test.digital
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:26:21 +0100
Paul Vigay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm currently developing a website for a client, and I'm using the
> tag instead of frames. Whilst it 'almost' works on NetSurf,
> there is no scrollbar so you can't read the bottom.
Why not use a frame instead? For embe
In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> Why not use a frame instead? For embedding HTML content, they're
> conceptually identical in so far as their annoyances and flaws.
I didn't really want to use frames due to having to r
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:11:02 +0100
Paul Vigay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not use a frame instead? For embedding HTML content, they're
> > conceptually identical in so far as their annoyances and flaws.
>
> I didn't really want to use frames due to having to recode the rest
> of the page,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Vigay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> > Why not use a frame instead? For embedding HTML content, they're
> > conceptually identical in so far as t
In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> How is this different from using ?
A single tag as opposed to an entire frameset which has to be in
the section of the website.
> You won't get any precise input from me, then :) A
In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michael Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> Not "frames", use an IFRAME instead of OBJECT.
Righto. I've changed it to an iframe, which does indeed correctly give a
scroll bar in NetSurf, but the background is fixed at white, ins
10 matches
Mail list logo