In article <5077caf1fcrh.li...@phone.coop>,
Russell Hafter - Lists wrote:
> In article <5077ca16fbcvj...@waitrose.com>, Chris Newman
> wrote:
> > The Museum of Bath at Work has a website, the URL of
> > which has changed over the years. The old URL still works
> > with Netsurf.
> > http://ww
In article <5077ca16fbcvj...@waitrose.com>, Chris Newman
wrote:
> The Museum of Bath at Work has a website, the URL of
> which has changed over the years. The old URL still works
> with Netsurf.
> http://www.paulbg.com/bathatwork/
> However, the following new one given in their literature
> do
Hi folks,
The Museum of Bath at Work has a website, the URL of which has changed over
the years.
The old URL still works with Netsurf.
http://www.paulbg.com/bathatwork/
However, the following new one given in their literature does not.
http://www.bath-at-work.org.uk
I get the error message "t
In article <507792044drh.li...@phone.coop>,
Russell Hafter - Lists wrote:
[Snip]
Replied off-list.
In article <507746ffee...@timil.com>, Tim Hill
wrote:
> I don't understand how anyone can manage with
> (a) only a handful of font families, and
> (b) everything they produce looking 'the same'.
I thought that was known as 'House Style', and generally to
be recommended.
I accept that posters
Tim Hill wrote:
I don't understand how anyone can manage with (a) only a handful of
font families, and (b) everything they produce looking 'the same'.
:-)
With hundreds of magpied font families, some may only be used once or
never, for a specific (printed on paper) document or to create a web