I've just noticed that the tag inside a heading which
has a larger font size results in a smaller font, not a larger one. I
suspect that the +/-whatever is interpretted as relative to the
default paragraph font size not the prevailing header font size. This
doesn't seem logical. What is the co
In article , Richard Porter
wrote:
> I've just noticed that the tag inside a heading which
> has a larger font size results in a smaller font, not a larger one. I
> suspect that the +/-whatever is interpretted as relative to the
> default paragraph font size not the prevailing header font size. T
On 31 Aug 2011 Tim Hill wrote:
> In article , Richard Porter
> wrote:
>> I've just noticed that the tag inside a heading which
>> has a larger font size results in a smaller font, not a larger one. I
>> suspect that the +/-whatever is interpretted as relative to the
>> default paragraph font si
In article , Richard Porter
wrote:
[Snip]
> Then there doesn't seem to be any point in size=±n.
I know I have used a structure like this somewhere:
SMALLCAPS
but not in a heading.
--
Tim Hill
..
