Re: netsurf-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 6

2012-03-29 Thread Tricia Garner
On 26 Mar, in article <8f18b3c749ca5517d1f25a4db079e5d1-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBeX15ZVF0WXVloCVQ6XFxcQ0IDWFhdQg==-webmailer2@s, m0n0 wrote: > Am Montag, den 26.03.2012, 00:37 +0200 schrieb Tim Hill > : > > Why's it there? Are there still people on dialup who need it? > Gener

Re: netsurf-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 6

2012-03-29 Thread evanallen
In article <5277f53bddtri...@orchid-squad.org.uk>, Tricia Garner wrote: > On 26 Mar, in article > <8f18b3c749ca5517d1f25a4db079e5d1-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBeX15ZVF0WXVloCVQ6XFxcQ0IDWFhdQg==-webmailer2@s, > m0n0 wrote: > > Am Montag, den 26.03.2012, 00:37 +0200 schrieb Tim Hil

Re: netsurf-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 6

2012-03-29 Thread Richard Porter
On 29 Mar 2012 Tricia Garner wrote: > How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads > which people haven't snipped repeated again and again possibly be > less annoying than 40 emails? Just curious. I quite agree. With 40 messages properly threaded it's easy just to ignore to

Digest mode

2012-03-29 Thread m0n0
Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 11:21 +0200 schrieb Richard Porter : With digests you have to plough through everything, and then of course you have the problem of how to post a reply. You can't talk for everyone. It depends on several things: for example personal taste and the application

Re: netsurf-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 6

2012-03-29 Thread george greenfield
In message Richard Porter wrote: > On 29 Mar 2012 Tricia Garner wrote: > >> How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads >> which people haven't snipped repeated again and again possibly be >> less annoying than 40 emails? Just curious. > > I quite agree. With 4

Digest mode

2012-03-29 Thread m0n0
Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 11:55 +0200 schrieb george greenfield : I too prefer individual messages, for same reasons as Richard states. I tend to ignore the digest, TBH. Sorry, I don't understand. Digest mode can be selected by the user, right? So if you don't enable it, you won't get

Re: Digest mode

2012-03-29 Thread george greenfield
In message <8d001425ead6b919cdaeed0ce55f3f6b-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFdd qzlvf5dqunbajbbxkngv10mqv13b0ttwzbeqkybx1tcrlfv-webmail...@server02.webmailer.ho steurope.de> m0n0 wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 11:55 +0200 schrieb george greenfield > : > >> I too prefer individual

Re: Digest mode

2012-03-29 Thread Dave Symes
In article <8d001425ead6b919cdaeed0ce55f3f6b-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBbXkNGV10MQV13B0tTWzBeQkYBX1tcRlFV-webmailer2@s, m0n0 wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 11:55 +0200 schrieb george greenfield > : > > I too prefer individual messages, for same reasons as Richard states

Re: Digest mode

2012-03-29 Thread evanallen
In article , george greenfield wrote: > I did enable it; it arrives; I tend to ignore it. Perhaps you ought to disable it? -- Barry A.

Re: Digest mode

2012-03-29 Thread george greenfield
In message <52782a9951evanal...@talktalk.net> wrote: > In article , george greenfield > wrote: >> I did enable it; it arrives; I tend to ignore it. > > Perhaps you ought to disable it? > You mean I ought to take control of my life? Steady on... -- george greenfield