In article <89691e5c55@abbeypress.net>, Jim Nagel
wrote:
> Richard Ashbery wrote on 5 Mar:
> > Now downloaded C1 #3433 and image displays correctly. Resizing
> > enlarges picture as expected. Text remains same size.
> Yes, here too, having newly updated to #3433. So thanks to the
> Netsurf
In article <89691e5c55@abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel wrote:
> Richard Ashbery wrote on 5 Mar:
> > Now downloaded C1 #3433 and image displays correctly. Resizing
> > enlarges picture as expected. Text remains same size.
> Yes, here too, having newly updated to #3433.
Same here, looks to be p
Richard Ashbery wrote on 5 Mar:
> Now downloaded C1 #3433 and image displays correctly. Resizing
> enlarges picture as expected. Text remains same size.
Yes, here too, having newly updated to #3433. So thanks to the
Netsurf team for correcting whatever it was.
(Now if only the Lloyds suits wil
In article , Dave Higton
wrote:
> In message <555bc1e2c8...@timil.com> Tim Hill wrote:
> > In article , Jim Nagel
> > wrote:
> > > Is it something about the coding of this site or about
> > > Netsurf's rendering of it? Or maybe it's in the CSS of the
> > > page?
> >
> > > https://www.change.or