In article <1fd5ae6f55@abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel wrote:
> Several months ago I got fed up with this, and also with time wasted
> by !Locate searching through all of !Cache. So on all my machines I
> made a new directory that comes alphabetically last: $._
I haven't actually got !Loca
In article <20160413104528.ga24...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> I will go over how this feature works once again.
[Snip]
Thanks Vincent for the long and detailed explanation of how Netsurf uses
the cache.
After over 45 years working with computers I understand that the use of
an
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:35:01PM +0100, Jim Nagel wrote:
> Vince M Hudd wrote on 13 Apr:
> > Ctrl-F5 - which may be unfamiliar, but is standard on all the browsers
> > I use (including NetSurf) - is the keystroke I use to reload pages
> > when working on websites because it *does* fetch a new ve
Vince M Hudd wrote on 13 Apr:
> Ctrl-F5 - which may be unfamiliar, but is standard on all the browsers
> I use (including NetSurf) - is the keystroke I use to reload pages
> when working on websites because it *does* fetch a new version of the
> page, rather than just reload it from a cache.
Inte
Jim Nagel wrote:
[Reloading a page didn't load a new version]
> (Hmm, just noticed from a search of Netsurf menu that the shortcut for
> "Navigate > Reload page" is Ctrl-F5 -- I didn't try that unfamiliar
> keystroke, but presume it does same as above.
FWIW, Ctril-F5 - which may be unfamiliar,
This might or might not be related to the issues Vincent Sanders talks
about in the current thread "Netsurf cache".
I recently updated the home page of my own website. Then tested
viewing it with Netsurf. It kept serving up the old page, despite my
clicking Netsurf's Reload button -- with Sel
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:06:04PM +0100, David Pitt wrote:
>
> How about this from a Titanium :-
>
> (75142.82) content/llcache.c:3402 llcache_finalise: Backing store wrote
> 2590212 bytes in 1394 ms (average 1858114 bytes/second)
1.8MB/sec to an SSD is nothing to write home about. I'd exp
Vincent Sanders, on 13 Apr, wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:49:39PM +0100, nets...@avisoft.f9.co.uk wrote:
> > There was much discussion about a year ago about the cache performance
> > on RISC OS, and there were some code changes, but I would like to add
> > the results of some investigations
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:49:39PM +0100, nets...@avisoft.f9.co.uk wrote:
> There was much discussion about a year ago about the cache performance on
> RISC OS, and there were some code changes, but I would like to add the
> results of some investigations of the Netsurf v3.4 cache on my Iyonix,
> r
