Re: [Bulk] Squashed image problem

2013-04-21 Thread Richard Porter
On 21 Apr 2013 Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:06:49AM +0100, Richard Porter wrote: >> I don't think there's anything I can do other than that. I was >> wondering whether there's a design reason why NS doesn't keep a copy >> of the resized image in its cache, which would save a l

Re: [Bulk] Squashed image problem

2013-04-21 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:06:49AM +0100, Richard Porter wrote: > I don't think there's anything I can do other than that. I was > wondering whether there's a design reason why NS doesn't keep a copy > of the resized image in its cache, which would save a lot of > processing time in such circums

Re: [Bulk] Squashed image problem

2013-04-21 Thread Richard Porter
On 21 Apr 2013 Brian Jordan wrote: > In article , >Richard Porter wrote: > [Snip] >> The problem is that as soon as these images hove into view the page >> becomes incredibly slow and clunky to move around. I would hazard a >> guess that NS is continually struggling to resize the images as

Re: [Bulk] Squashed image problem

2013-04-20 Thread Brian Jordan
In article , Richard Porter wrote: [Snip] > The problem is that as soon as these images hove into view the page > becomes incredibly slow and clunky to move around. I would hazard a > guess that NS is continually struggling to resize the images as it > tries to move them around. Almost certa