In article <53d954c84abrian.jord...@btinternet.com>,
Brian Jordan wrote:
> I work on the assumption that if a merge-boot or merge-system is required
> that NetSurf will let me know with an appropriate message.
Me too.
I only bother with the other stuff in the download if !NetSurf complains.
In message
Jim Nagel wrote:
> Brian Jordan wrote on 13 Feb:
>
>> In article <9b5f51d953@abbeypress.net>,
>>Jim Nagel wrote:
>>> Suggestion to the Netsurf team:
>
>>> Please, could you include an extra "Readme-date" file in the download
>>> zipfile that would simply state in
Brian Jordan wrote on 13 Feb:
> In article <9b5f51d953@abbeypress.net>,
>Jim Nagel wrote:
>> Suggestion to the Netsurf team:
>> Please, could you include an extra "Readme-date" file in the download
>> zipfile that would simply state in plain text the date of the last
>> actual change an
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56:17PM +, Brian Jordan wrote:
> I work on the assumption that if a merge-boot or merge-system is required
> that NetSurf will let me know with an appropriate message. Otherwise I
> just let NetSurf get on with it. Am I under vigilant or are you over
> vigilant? It s
In article <9b5f51d953@abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel wrote:
[Snip]
> Suggestion to the Netsurf team:
> Please, could you include an extra "Readme-date" file in the download
> zipfile that would simply state in plain text the date of the last
> actual change and words to the effect that "I
I have just downloaded the current development version,
NetSurf-gcc-json-1718/zip and am in the throes of installing it on
several machines here.
Datestamps on the !Boot and !System folders and all their contents
were lost again sometime before 2014-02-04 (possibly before
2013-04-25, which is
