In article <89691e5c55@abbeypress.net>, Jim Nagel
wrote:
> Richard Ashbery wrote on 5 Mar:
> > Now downloaded C1 #3433 and image displays correctly. Resizing
> > enlarges picture as expected. Text remains same size.
> Yes, here too, having newly updated to #3433. So thanks to the
> Netsurf
In article <89691e5c55@abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel wrote:
> Richard Ashbery wrote on 5 Mar:
> > Now downloaded C1 #3433 and image displays correctly. Resizing
> > enlarges picture as expected. Text remains same size.
> Yes, here too, having newly updated to #3433.
Same here, looks to be p
Richard Ashbery wrote on 5 Mar:
> Now downloaded C1 #3433 and image displays correctly. Resizing
> enlarges picture as expected. Text remains same size.
Yes, here too, having newly updated to #3433. So thanks to the
Netsurf team for correcting whatever it was.
(Now if only the Lloyds suits wil
In article , Dave Higton
wrote:
> In message <555bc1e2c8...@timil.com> Tim Hill wrote:
> > In article , Jim Nagel
> > wrote:
> > > Is it something about the coding of this site or about
> > > Netsurf's rendering of it? Or maybe it's in the CSS of the
> > > page?
> >
> > > https://www.change.or
In article , Jim Nagel
wrote:
> Is it something about the coding of this site or about Netsurf's
> rendering of it? Or maybe it's in the CSS of the page?
> https://www.change.org/p/last-bank-standing-don-t-let-communities-lose-their-only-bank
> The picture displays so huge as to be unrecogniza
Is it something about the coding of this site or about Netsurf's
rendering of it? Or maybe it's in the CSS of the page?
https://www.change.org/p/last-bank-standing-don-t-let-communities-lose-their-only-bank
The picture displays so huge as to be unrecognizable pixels;
paragraphs of text are a
