On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 21:53 +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
> Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos writes:
>
> > What about extending the macros in version.h with a simple to use
> > combined version number?
>
> I think I'd prefer to leave that out. The formatting is very
> arbitrary, and any
> application which
On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 13:13 +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
>
> > I'd be willing to throw in aarch64 as well because I've got some
> > Pine64s running BE floating around also. :)
>
> Aarch64 assembly (for both endian flavors) would be nice, but it's a
> separate project. I haven't yet looked into aarc
Hi,
I've been trying out the sha_ni instructions available on some newer
x86_64 processors.
Below replacement for sha1-compress.asm seems to run on roughly 2
cycles/byte when I benchmark it on an "AMD Ryzen 7 1700X" cpu in the gcc
compile farm. Still sligthly slower than openssl, to squeeze out a
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos writes:
> What about extending the macros in version.h with a simple to use
> combined version number?
I think I'd prefer to leave that out. The formatting is very arbitrary, and any
application which needs it can
#define NETTLE_COMBINED_VERSION \
((NETTLE_VERSION_MAJ
Michael Weiser writes:
>> What board and linux (dist?) are you running this on?
>
> I have a number of Cubieboard2s that run Gentoo Linux with a vanilla,
> mainline Linus kernel.
>
> # uname -a
> Linux b 4.15.0-gentoo #2 SMP Sun Feb 4 18:46:30 CET 2018 armv7b
> ARMv7 Processor rev 4 (v7b) Allwinn
What about extending the macros in version.h with a simple to use
combined version number?
From e96108cbb92a923e02349a0d3b672a9b2b94c8b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 11:29:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] version.h: introduce NETTLE_VERSION
That macro is
