Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos writes:
> Niels, I'm not sure however if that was your intention. Didn't you
> want to deprecate some of the _nettle symbols as well like
> _nettle_secp_256r1?
I was thinking of doing something simple, with nettle_* symbols going
into the supported ABI (symbol version NET
On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 10:41 +0200, Niels Möller wrote:
> Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos writes:
>
> > Niels, I'm not sure however if that was your intention. Didn't you
> > want to deprecate some of the _nettle symbols as well like
> > _nettle_secp_256r1?
>
> I was thinking of doing something simple, w
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos writes:
> If you mean removing them from the public headers and placing them in
> one (or multiple) internal ones, it makes sense to me.
Sounds reasonable. Then it's harder to use them without realizing
they're internal and not compatible over version changes (even thoug
