Steven Stallion wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Jason King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Garrett D'Amore
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Steven Stallion wrote:
>> > > Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> > >> IMO, plenty of value. Though the number o
Jason King wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Garrett D'Amore
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Steven Stallion wrote:
>> > Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> >> IMO, plenty of value. Though the number of new drivers that could
>> >> take advantage of it is probably not too great -- not too m
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Jason King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Garrett D'Amore
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Steven Stallion wrote:
> > > Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> > >> IMO, plenty of value. Though the number of new drivers that could
> > >> t
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Garrett D'Amore
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steven Stallion wrote:
> > Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> >> IMO, plenty of value. Though the number of new drivers that could
> >> take advantage of it is probably not too great -- not too many new
> >> 100M/1G chips are
Steven Stallion wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> IMO, plenty of value. Though the number of new drivers that could
>> take advantage of it is probably not too great -- not too many new
>> 100M/1G chips are entering the market now -- everything seems to be
>> focused on 10G for new development
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> IMO, plenty of value. Though the number of new drivers that could take
> advantage of it is probably not too great -- not too many new 100M/1G
> chips are entering the market now -- everything seems to be focused on
> 10G for new development.
Sounds like a plan.
At a
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>
> IMO, plenty of value. Though the number of new drivers that could take
> advantage of it is probably not too great -- not too many new 100M/1G
> chips are entering the market now -- everything seems to be focused on
> 10G for new development.
>
I think there's be p
Steven Stallion wrote:
> All,
>
> I am working with Jason King to write an open implementation of the
> Cassini chipset driver (ce).
>
> While discussing some of the work that needs to be done this evening,
> Jason brought up a good question: why are there no kernel modules for
> MII/GMII? I kno
