On 10/01/2012 11:44 AM, Jiri Popelka wrote:
On 09/27/2012 10:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
also request fqdn.fqdn;
also request fqdn.hostname;
also request fqdn.domainname;
These are DHCPv4 options which DHCPv6 client doesn't know.
That is not clear. The dhcp-options man-page could be inte
On 10/01/2012 12:47 PM, Jiri Popelka wrote:
On 10/01/2012 06:33 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
One of the problems I see is that, while there are a couple of viable
dchp servers out there, where the ISC server is suppose to be the
industrial strength one, dhclient seems to be the only client for th
On 10/01/2012 06:33 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
One of the problems I see is that, while there are a couple of viable
dchp servers out there, where the ISC server is suppose to be the
industrial strength one, dhclient seems to be the only client for the
linux/*bsd/Unix systems.
I wonder if the
On 09/27/2012 10:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
also request fqdn.fqdn;
also request fqdn.hostname;
also request fqdn.domainname;
These are DHCPv4 options which DHCPv6 client doesn't know.
also request dhcp6.hostname;
also request dhcp6.domainname;
I can't find such options in dhcp-options(
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 06:54 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 04:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> > OK, anyone have any experience sending commands, requests etc. via
> > dhclient?
> >
> > I have my patch fixed up so that it works from a conf file rather than
> > "-F" on the commandlin
> From: "Bjørn Mork"
> Pavel Simerda writes:
>
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Bjørn Mork"
> >> To: "Gene Czarcinski"
> >> Cc: networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> >> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012
Pavel Simerda writes:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Bjørn Mork"
>> To: "Gene Czarcinski"
>> Cc: networkmanager-list@gnome.org
>> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:46:31 AM
>> Subject: Re: G ... dhcpd6
>>
>>
> From: "Gene Czarcinski"
> On 09/28/2012 08:15 AM, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> > You*may* be right. But, unfortunately, I have been playing with
> > DHCPv6
> > implementations and there wasn't one that I would actually like.
> > Except
> > ISC DHCP which works for me but needs improvement.
> Give dns
On 09/28/2012 08:15 AM, Pavel Simerda wrote:
You*may* be right. But, unfortunately, I have been playing with DHCPv6
implementations and there wasn't one that I would actually like. Except
ISC DHCP which works for me but needs improvement.
Give dnsmasq a look. It seems that not only NetworkManag
- Original Message -
> From: "Bjørn Mork"
> To: "Gene Czarcinski"
> Cc: networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:46:31 AM
> Subject: Re: G ... dhcpd6
>
> Gene Czarcinski writes:
>
> > OK, anyone have
On 09/27/2012 04:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
OK, anyone have any experience sending commands, requests etc. via
dhclient?
I have my patch fixed up so that it works from a conf file rather than
"-F" on the commandline since that is a "Red Hat ism".
I am asking for some stuff and I get littl
* Bjørn Mork
> Hmm, looking at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626514 it
> seems that Redhat is using a heavily patched ISC dhclient, fixing these
> shortcomings. But I wonder if they are prepared to take over as
> upstream? If not, then I suggest that NM development look for other
>
Gene Czarcinski writes:
> OK, anyone have any experience sending commands, requests etc. via dhclient?
Well, if you ask me (OK, you didn't, but I am answering anyway :-) then
the IPv6 support in the ISC dhclient is far from mature enough to be
used for anything yet, and it moves at a pace which.
OK, anyone have any experience sending commands, requests etc. via dhclient?
I have my patch fixed up so that it works from a conf file rather than
"-F" on the commandline since that is a "Red Hat ism".
I am asking for some stuff and I get little back from dhcpd6 [that is
using radvd, named,
14 matches
Mail list logo
