I guess I don't have a problem with merging them, although strictly
speaking they refer to different things - locks vs. the PINs needed to
unlock those locks.
Yeah, you're totally right... but at the end the PIN/PUK codes are
directly related to facilities. E.g SIM
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 09:11 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
I guess I don't have a problem with merging them, although strictly
speaking they refer to different things - locks vs. the PINs needed to
unlock those locks.
Yeah, you're totally right... but at the end the PIN/PUK
I guess I don't have a problem with merging them, although strictly
speaking they refer to different things - locks vs. the PINs needed to
unlock those locks.
Yeah, you're totally right... but at the end the PIN/PUK codes are
directly related to facilities. E.g SIM facility, has
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 20:14 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
Hey hey,
I guess I don't have a problem with merging them, although strictly
speaking they refer to different things - locks vs. the PINs needed to
unlock those locks.
Yeah, you're totally right... but at the end the PIN/PUK
Hey Eric Dan,
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 15:10 -0500, Eric Shienbrood wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] Added new property to track which facility locks are
enabled.
The property EnabledFacilityLocks on the .Modem.Gsm.Card interface
is a bit mask that indicates which of the various personalization
codes
I guess I don't have a problem with merging them, although strictly
speaking they refer to different things - locks vs. the PINs needed to
unlock those locks.
Two other points to consider regarding lock/PIN handling in the new API:
- PIN, PUK, PIN2, and PUK2 are PINs for SIM locks. The rest
Hey hey,
I guess I don't have a problem with merging them, although strictly
speaking they refer to different things - locks vs. the PINs needed to
unlock those locks.
Yeah, you're totally right... but at the end the PIN/PUK codes are
directly related to facilities. E.g SIM facility, has PIN
From 2594d75ec8535e54afb556708a8e17ab77ed68bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Shienbrood e...@chromium.org
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:58:59 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Added new property to track which facility locks are enabled.
The property EnabledFacilityLocks on the .Modem.Gsm.Card interface
