ermany to get a dedicated VDSL
> > > > modem so that you can do the PPPoE yourself, so I can't comment about
> > > > the exchanges that go on on the wire.
> > >
> > > You can't use any VDSL modem, or bridge the one you have?
> >
> > M
utomatically at boot, no problem. Otherwise you need to remember to
activate the dummy when you bring up the pppoe; probably you can
achieve that using dispatcher scripts.
Beniamino
> > No need to assign an address to a link unless you want to assign
> > a prefix to it.
>
> Hav
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 09:28:16PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:36:23PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > Marc Haber writes:
> > > Unfortunately, it is pretty hard in Germany to get a dedicated VDSL
> > > modem so that you can do the PPPoE yoursel
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:36:23PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Marc Haber writes:
> > Unfortunately, it is pretty hard in Germany to get a dedicated VDSL
> > modem so that you can do the PPPoE yourself, so I can't comment about
> > the exchanges that go on on the wire.
&
Unfortunately, it is pretty hard in Germany to get a dedicated VDSL
> modem so that you can do the PPPoE yourself, so I can't comment about
> the exchanges that go on on the wire.
You can't use any VDSL modem, or bridge the one you have?
Bjørn
On 16/06/2021 11:44, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Not at all. Assigning a global address to lo (loopback) is perfectly
fine.
Can an address from PD be automatically assigned to lo by NetworkManager?
No need to assign an address to a link unless you want to assign
a prefix to it.
Having the address o
Steve Hill via networkmanager-list
writes:
> On 16/06/2021 10:12, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
>
>> You are right, RFC 3633 forbids it. However, if I understand correctly
>> this approach is the one mentioned in [1], which refers to an expired
>> IETF draft [2] saying:
>
> RFC 3633 has been obsoleted
egated for assignment to internal networks.
Unfortunately, it is pretty hard in Germany to get a dedicated VDSL
modem so that you can do the PPPoE yourself, so I can't comment about
the exchanges that go on on the wire.
> There is also the weird 3GPP solution, where you put a /64 hole
Steve Hill via networkmanager-list
writes:
> On 16/06/2021 10:36, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>
>> Do you mean these RAs do not contain any valid prefix?
>
> Correct, they do not contain a prefix and set the M flag.
Hmm, which indicates that you should get an IA_NA address. If they only
provided IA_P
Steve Hill via networkmanager-list
writes:
> That said, I'm not sure I've ever seen an ISP use SLAAC over PPP, so
> is this *really* in any way standard?
IPv6 tries hard to be link agnostic. A PPP link is configured like any
other link. The only difference is the bootstrapping of the link-local
Steve Hill via networkmanager-list
writes:
> That's a pain. It basically makes it impossible for a single-NIC
> machine to connect to an ISP that is only responding to IA_PD. (Well,
> you can obviously set up a dummy NIC, which can be assigned a prefix,
> but that's a kludge).
Not at all. As
On 16/06/2021 10:12, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
You are right, RFC 3633 forbids it. However, if I understand correctly
this approach is the one mentioned in [1], which refers to an expired
IETF draft [2] saying:
RFC 3633 has been obsoleted by RFC 8415, and this MUST NOT does not
appear to be me
On 16/06/2021 10:36, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
SLAAC is used by your own system, not ISP. ISP sends RA. Your system
uses SLAAC to build address using these RA. You yourself said they are
present (you mentioned M an O flags).
SLAAC is only supposed to be performed if the RA's M flag is not set.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:28 PM Steve Hill wrote:
>
> On 16/06/2021 10:07, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>
> > The default and standard method to assign IPv6 address is SLAAC.
> > DHCPv6 is optional. You need to investigate why SLAAC address was not
> > assigned.
>
> As I said, I'm not 100% sure that t
On 16/06/2021 10:07, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
The default and standard method to assign IPv6 address is SLAAC.
DHCPv6 is optional. You need to investigate why SLAAC address was not
assigned.
As I said, I'm not 100% sure that the ISP is behaving correctly,
although Bjørn indicated that what the
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:13 PM Beniamino Galvani wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:43:36AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>
> > It is explicitly prohibited to assign any IA_PD prefix to the same
> > interface via which this was obtained.
> >
> >
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:43:36AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> It is explicitly prohibited to assign any IA_PD prefix to the same
> interface via which this was obtained.
>
> the requesting router MUST
>NOT assign any delegated prefixes or su
Steve Hill writes:
> On 15/06/2021 18:19, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
>> Yes, that is buggy. I wonder... I did hit a similar issue many many
>> years ago while testing IPv6 over PPPoE (which we didn't end up doing in
>> the end).
>
> I'm not entirely sure how the
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:03 PM Steve Hill wrote:
>
> On 16/06/2021 09:43, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>
> > It is explicitly prohibited to assign any IA_PD prefix to the same
> > interface via which this was obtained.
> >
> >the requesting router MUST
On 16/06/2021 09:43, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
It is explicitly prohibited to assign any IA_PD prefix to the same
interface via which this was obtained.
the requesting router MUST
NOT assign any delegated prefixes or subnets from the delegated
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:39 AM Beniamino Galvani via
networkmanager-list wrote:
> >
> > It feels as though NetworkManager should always be making both IA_NA and
> > IA_PD requests and, if it didn't receive an IA_NA response from the ISP, it
> > should assign an address from the delegated prefix
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 03:44:47PM +0100, Steve Hill via networkmanager-list
wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get to grips with IPv6-PD over PPPoE.
>
> I'm on CentOS 8 (NetworkManager 1.30) and have main.dhcp=dhclient. My PPPoE
> connection is set to ipv6.method=auto.
>
On 15/06/2021 18:19, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Yes, that is buggy. I wonder... I did hit a similar issue many many
years ago while testing IPv6 over PPPoE (which we didn't end up doing in
the end).
I'm not entirely sure how the default route is assigned - on ethernet it
would be assigned
solicitation is working but DHCPv6
> isn't giving out an address or prefix.
Yes, that is buggy. I wonder... I did hit a similar issue many many
years ago while testing IPv6 over PPPoE (which we didn't end up doing in
the end).
We allocate one static prefix per line/user and use RAD
On 15/06/2021 15:56, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Is my ISP behaving in a broken way, by not assigning me an address in
response to IA_NA, or is it standard behaviour for ISPs to only
respond to IA_PD requests?
There is no standard behaviour. Both ways are fine. There usually
isn't much need for the IA
Steve Hill via networkmanager-list
writes:
> Is my ISP behaving in a broken way, by not assigning me an address in
> response to IA_NA, or is it standard behaviour for ISPs to only
> respond to IA_PD requests?
There is no standard behaviour. Both ways are fine. There usually
isn't much need fo
I'm trying to get to grips with IPv6-PD over PPPoE.
I'm on CentOS 8 (NetworkManager 1.30) and have main.dhcp=dhclient. My
PPPoE connection is set to ipv6.method=auto.
With no NICs set to ipv6.manual=shared, I can see from a traffic dump that:
- PPP link comes up and assigns IP
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 10:22:44AM +0200, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 09:44:23AM -0700, Patrick Mansfield via
> networkmanager-list wrote:
> > I've been trying to directly use my linux system as the router / gateway
> > with my
> > CenturyLin
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 09:44:23AM -0700, Patrick Mansfield via
networkmanager-list wrote:
> I've been trying to directly use my linux system as the router / gateway with
> my
> CenturyLink ISP - it requires PPPoE and VLAN.
>
> Is PPPoE over VLAN supported by NetworkM
I've been trying to directly use my linux system as the router / gateway with my
CenturyLink ISP - it requires PPPoE and VLAN.
Is PPPoE over VLAN supported by NetworkManager?
I saw a response from 2017 that it was not supported, but can't tell if that's
still
the case.
I'
Hello everyone,
I use a PPPoE connection in NetworkManager (RHEL 8.1, NM 1.20.0) to
connect with my ISP via DSL modem. My ISP supports IPv4 and IPv6 in
dual stack mode and provides the IPv6 config information via router
advertisements (i.e., no DHCPv6). I would like to use IPv4 as well as
IPv6
On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 19:50 -0500, Mr. Christian Strubel via
networkmanager-list wrote:
> What do I need to enter in the DCB tab for Network Manager
> to work with a PPPoE Internet connection?
You shouldn't need to enter anything DCB ("Data Center Bridging") for
PPPoE ac
What do I need to enter in the DCB tab for Network Manager
to work with a PPPoE Internet connection?
--
Mr. Chris Strubel
cwstru...@gmail.com
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 12:05 +, Matteo Croce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to bring up a PPPoE session over a VLAN, but it seems that NM
> doesn't have support for it.
> As it's a pretty common setup with VDSL2 and FTTH lines, do you plan
> to support it?
>
> Reg
Hi,
I tried to bring up a PPPoE session over a VLAN, but it seems that NM
doesn't have support for it.
As it's a pretty common setup with VDSL2 and FTTH lines, do you plan
to support it?
Regards,
--
Matteo Croce
Ubuntu - Linux For Human Beings
perl -e 'for($t=0;;$t++){print c
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:10 +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My target is: CentOS 7 on a X less gateway
> My internet provider provides a pppoe connection with a login and a
> password
>
> On CentOS6, I used to setip it up with rp-pppoe wizzard and it wo
Hi all,
My target is: CentOS 7 on a X less gateway
My internet provider provides a pppoe connection with a login and a password
On CentOS6, I used to setip it up with rp-pppoe wizzard and it works: it
sets up the needed things to make the network init script launch the
connection at boot.
I
Hi,
I'm doing some debugging of PPPoE support in NetworkManager. So if
you're using PPPoE successfully with NetworkManager, can you do a few
things for me?
While connected:
1) run 'ifconfig ' for the ethernet interface that your PPPoE
session is running over. I'm
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 07:57 +0200, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 21:38 +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
> >> This is a first cut at experimental PPPoE support for ADSL devices.
> >> Ther
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 21:38 +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
>> This is a first cut at experimental PPPoE support for ADSL devices.
>> There are several shortcuts and the code is ugly, but it works so
>> it can be
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 21:38 +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
> This is a first cut at experimental PPPoE support for ADSL devices.
> There are several shortcuts and the code is ugly, but it works so
> it can be used as a strawman to improve upon.
>
> Happily waiting for com
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 21:38 +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
> This is a first cut at experimental PPPoE support for ADSL devices.
> There are several shortcuts and the code is ugly, but it works so
> it can be used as a strawman to improve upon.
>
> Happily waiting for com
This is a first cut at experimental PPPoE support for ADSL devices.
There are several shortcuts and the code is ugly, but it works so
it can be used as a strawman to improve upon.
Happily waiting for comments / testing / suggestions :)
With this code and a system keyfile connection like the
My ISP is trialling native IPv6 connectivity over ADSL. I have
successfully got my Speedtouch 546v6 modem/router into bridge mode so
that the PC is managing the PPPoE connection itself.
The ISP has given me IPv6 addresses to use.
I can connect OK to the ISP with the DSL tab of Network Manager
Hi there,
It would seem that NM always creates the default route for PPPoE connections
with a metric of 0.
That confuses my VPN, as it needs to override the previous default
route. But I can't set the metric manually, as I'd have to override the entire
default route statically, h
ote:
>> >>> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 21:04 +0800, Mu Qiao wrote:
>> >>>> Hi dear Dan and all,
>> >>>> I've tried to find how to add pppoe connection in NM plug-in. But I
>> >>>> didn't find any example in existing plugin so
te:
> >>>> Hi dear Dan and all,
> >>>> I've tried to find how to add pppoe connection in NM plug-in. But I
> >>>> didn't find any example in existing plugin source code. Is there
> >>>> anything I missed?
> >>>
&g
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Mu Qiao wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Mu Qiao wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 21:04 +0800, Mu Qiao wrote:
>>>> Hi dear Dan and all,
>>>> I've
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Mu Qiao wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 21:04 +0800, Mu Qiao wrote:
>>> Hi dear Dan and all,
>>> I've tried to find how to add pppoe connection in NM plug-in. But I
>>
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 21:04 +0800, Mu Qiao wrote:
>> Hi dear Dan and all,
>> I've tried to find how to add pppoe connection in NM plug-in. But I
>> didn't find any example in existing plugin source code. Is ther
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 21:04 +0800, Mu Qiao wrote:
> Hi dear Dan and all,
> I've tried to find how to add pppoe connection in NM plug-in. But I
> didn't find any example in existing plugin source code. Is there
> anything I missed?
The connection editor does add PPPoE. No
Hi dear Dan and all,
I've tried to find how to add pppoe connection in NM plug-in. But I
didn't find any example in existing plugin source code. Is there
anything I missed?
Then I tried to write code in the way similar as adding a
wired_connection_setting as following:
NMSe
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 22:20 -0200, José Queiroz wrote:
> 2009/12/29 Graham Beneke :
> > If you dig through the archives you'll find a number of mentions of this
> > issue. The devs are aware of the problem and there is work being done to
> > support PPPoE on interface
2009/12/29 Graham Beneke :
> If you dig through the archives you'll find a number of mentions of this
> issue. The devs are aware of the problem and there is work being done to
> support PPPoE on interfaces other than eth0. I'm not sure what the current
> progress is on t
f:
ls -al /sys/class/net/ib0/
and:
ls -al /sys/class/net/ib0/device/
> > Is eth0 a normal ethernet NIC on your machine? And next, does the
>
> Yes, eth0 is a standard realtek 10/100Mbit
>
> > iBurst modem basically act like a USB ethernet device?
>
> The ibdriver
dem basically act like a USB ethernet device?
The ibdriver kernel module creates a virtual wireless network device,
which allows PPPoE connections for internet access. It uses the
wireless network device driver API of the kernel in the ib-net module,
which then uses the ib-usb or ib-pcmcia module
7;s not a GPRS/3G, so I can't take the wireless-broadband steps in
> the connection editor. The DSL steps should work perfectly, except the
> nic passed to pppd is my ethernet device instead of the one created by
> the driver. PPPoE must happen via this device, where the driver will
ote:
>> Quintin Beukes wrote:
>>>
>>> I am trying to connect to a wireless-broadband provider using an
>>> iBurst modem. The driver creates a network device, which reports
>>
>> If you dig through the archives you'll find a number of mentions of this
&g
ying to connect to a wireless-broadband provider using an
>> iBurst modem. The driver creates a network device, which reports
>
> If you dig through the archives you'll find a number of mentions of this
> issue. The devs are aware of the problem and there is work being done to
being done to
support PPPoE on interfaces other than eth0. I'm not sure what the
current progress is on this.
There is also some work being done to rewrite the iBurst driver and get
it rolled into the kernel but that has been a little slow.
itself as a wireless device (so iwconfig lists
ion editor. The DSL steps should work perfectly, except the
nic passed to pppd is my ethernet device instead of the one created by
the driver. PPPoE must happen via this device, where the driver will
pass it onto the modem via USB and the rest happens as usual.
Either way, when NetworkManager invoke
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 15:40 +0200, list wrote:
> Hiho!
>
> After a suspend to disk, NetworkManager fails to connect to my PPPoE DSL
> line. I use exactly the same username & password as in my plain standard
> init-script, however the init-script connects fine. All I can see
Hiho!
After a suspend to disk, NetworkManager fails to connect to my PPPoE DSL
line. I use exactly the same username & password as in my plain standard
init-script, however the init-script connects fine. All I can see from
pppd right now is "LCP terminated by peer". Now
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 12:08 +0100, Yann Simon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to connect to my DSL provider with wireless network, I have to:
> - set up a static IP
> - use PPPoe (with pon dsl-provider)
NM doesn't support PPPoE over wireless yet, but that was mostly an
oversight. NM 0.7
Hi,
to connect to my DSL provider with wireless network, I have to:
- set up a static IP
- use PPPoe (with pon dsl-provider)
I do not use NetworkManager now. I have instead parametered everything
with command line tools (iwconfig, ifconfig and pppoeconf).
It works quite well. But the connection
gt; How could I fix this without disabling SELinux, as restorecon doesn't seem to
> work it out?
> Thanks!
We probably need to update the SELinux policy to allow NM to do some of
these things. First though, could you install gdb, then
'debuginfo-install NetworkManager-debuginfo
Hello.
I've set up a DSL connection in NM Applet, but when I select the DSL
connection, NM dies, probably cause SELinux stuff:
SELinux is preventing gdb (NetworkManager_t) "write" to ./rpm (rpm_var_lib_t).
SELinux is preventing gdb (NetworkManager_t) "getattr" to /var/lib/rpm/Packages
(rpm_var_li
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 20:45 +0200, Björn Martensen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd just like to know if current svn versions of NM 0.7 are supposed to
> have working pppoe support. (libnm: 3571, nm: 3572, nm-applet: 685)
> I entered the username and the password, left the service blank,
Hi,
I'd just like to know if current svn versions of NM 0.7 are supposed to
have working pppoe support. (libnm: 3571, nm: 3572, nm-applet: 685)
I entered the username and the password, left the service blank, as i
have no idea what is supposed to go in there and it works with rp-pppoe
and
nstead of checking global variable'user' to avoid the
> error.
Yeah, found that and fixed; typo on my part but the slightly older gcc
I'm using doesn't error out on that one. Fixed in SVN now though.
Dan
> Dan, I've verified the PPPoE function with pap and
n, I've verified the PPPoE function with pap and chap
authentication, and fixed another bug. see below
ChangeLog
* src/ppp-manager/nm-ppp-manager.c
- (nm_ppp_manager_start): add valid check for
ppp_setting, which if non-initialized would cause crash
2008/4/17
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 16:03 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 21:56 +0800, 陈鑫 wrote:
> > Dear Dan,
> >
> > I used PPPoE function of NetworkManager with ppp-2.4.4，I
> > found some problems and fixed it.
>
> Thanks! Committed to SVN.
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 21:56 +0800, 陈鑫 wrote:
> Dear Dan,
>
> I used PPPoE function of NetworkManager with ppp-2.4.4，I
> found some problems and fixed it.
Thanks! Committed to SVN. Can you verify that the version I committed
works for you? I added a pap_check_hook th
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 13:12 -0400, Matt Burkhardt wrote:
> I'm running nm-applet 0.6.5 with a wireless card and router. I
> recently had to change ISP's and they had me change the way my router
> was working from Automatic Configuration - DHCP to PPPoE.
>
> I realized th
I'm running nm-applet 0.6.5 with a wireless card and router. I recently
had to change ISP's and they had me change the way my router was working
from Automatic Configuration - DHCP to PPPoE.
I realized that I wasn't connecting to the router with my server
anymore, (I'm runni
Dear Dan,
I used PPPoE function of NetworkManager with ppp-2.4.4，I
found some problems and fixed it.
ChangeLog
* src/nm-device-802-3-ethernet.c
-(real_deactivate_quickly): clear ip_iface of the device.
nm_system_device_set_from_ip4_config() used to use pppoe
I mean pppoe, gsm, cdma.
About GSM/CDMA. I think there should be fallback option to manually
specify modem type.That could be unknown usb device or RS-232 one, GSM
modem for example, it still has this interface.
2008/4/5, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 00
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 22:27 +0200, Björn Martensen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 15:55 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 22:56 +0400, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> > > rp-pppoe could be started with empty service string, this fixes the case.
> >
> > Ah
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 00:24 +0400, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> One question more: why not to move all the user/password fields to
> ppp-setting?
> Any reason for duplicating them each time?
You mean in both PPPoE and PPP? I'm not quite sure, Tambet did the work
there and might know mo
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 15:55 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 22:56 +0400, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> > rp-pppoe could be started with empty service string, this fixes the case.
>
> Ah, interesting. What I've done instead is to make an empty service
> fail va
One question more: why not to move all the user/password fields to ppp-setting?
Any reason for duplicating them each time?
vitja.
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-lis
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 00:06 +0400, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2008/4/4, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 22:56 +0400, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> > > rp-pppoe could be started with empty service string, this fixes the case.
> >
> >
> > A
2008/4/4, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 22:56 +0400, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> > rp-pppoe could be started with empty service string, this fixes the case.
>
>
> Ah, interesting. What I've done instead is to make an empty service
> fail
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 17:39 +0800, charlyliu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was trying to use the pppoe features. I create a connection in gconf. But I
> don't really know what it should have. Now I only put the directory ppp,
> copying the settings of a vpn connection, the dire
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 22:56 +0400, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> rp-pppoe could be started with empty service string, this fixes the case.
Ah, interesting. What I've done instead is to make an empty service
fail validation of the setting. I'm curious where that empty service is
coming f
Hi all,
I was trying to use the pppoe features. I create a connection in gconf. But I
don't really know what it should have. Now I only put the directory ppp,
copying the settings of a vpn connection, the directory pppoe with the
username, password and service key and the directory conne
rp-pppoe could be started with empty service string, this fixes the case.
Index: src/ppp-manager/nm-ppp-manager.c
===
--- src/ppp-manager/nm-ppp-manager.c(revision 3521)
+++ src/ppp-manager/nm-ppp-manager.c(working copy
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it strictly necessary to have a new NMSetting subclass for PPPoE?
> Just curious.
No, but we need something to tell pppd it needs to use pppoe plugin,
username, password, and service name. All that can be
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 22:42 -0600, Tambet Ingo wrote:
> Heya,
>
> After all these ppp manager mails I decided to see what really is
> missing from NM to add some new PPP based connections (NM supposedly
> supported only PPP over serial line). I chose PPPoE since I need to
> i
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 22:42 -0600, Tambet Ingo wrote:
> Heya,
>
> After all these ppp manager mails I decided to see what really is
> missing from NM to add some new PPP based connections (NM supposedly
> supported only PPP over serial line). I chose PPPoE since I need to
> i
Hi seems nice!
Please add setting property servcie, some ISP really need it, they
dont reply on PPPoE broadcast query, and the service should be
manually set. This is rp_pppoe_service plugin option. It's better to
use nic-$(iface) instead if $(iface) one as rp-pppoe plugin handles
only eth%
r mails I decided to see what really is
> missing from NM to add some new PPP based connections (NM supposedly
> supported only PPP over serial line). I chose PPPoE since I need to
> implement it anyway. Turns out, it's as easy as I imagined it would
> be. Well, almost. There's o
Heya,
After all these ppp manager mails I decided to see what really is
missing from NM to add some new PPP based connections (NM supposedly
supported only PPP over serial line). I chose PPPoE since I need to
implement it anyway. Turns out, it's as easy as I imagined it would
be. Well, a
Hi list,
I have a F7 installed on a computer with pppoe DSL link to internet.
I don't know how to configure NM to have net connectivity via
DSL/PPPeE without human intervention.
If the NM service is started I don't have net access because I am losing
the default gateway trough ppp0 a
hey, i have one idea, why gnome don't have tab for configuration pppoe
conection? only linux console!!
thx!___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
I have an ADSL internet connection, and I connect via PPPoE. I've configured
my ubuntu machine using the pppoeconf command, and I have a working internet
connection.
Yesterday I upgraded to ubuntu feisty, and saw the new network manager
combined. Unfortunately, all I can see is an icon s
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 12:31 +0200, Marek wrote:
> Hi.
> Just wanted to say that we should have PPPoE support in Networkmanager
> too. For me it is very necessary.
Yes! There's work going on here. We're not sure if it will hit the
next major release, but it's quite nea
Hi.
Just wanted to say that we should have PPPoE support in Networkmanager
too. For me it is very necessary.
Marek
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager
98 matches
Mail list logo
