On 02/10/2015 06:31 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 10:24 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
On 01/28/2015 01:23 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:43 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
On 01/12/2015 12:50 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:44 -0500, Jeremy Moles wro
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 10:24 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/28/2015 01:23 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:43 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> >> On 01/12/2015 12:50 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:44 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 12:42 PM
Dan Williams writes:
> On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 10:24 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
>> I'm working on testing this patch, but something else funny is
>> occurring. I can no longer actually query the device using qmicli
>> anymore under any condition... every attempt times out or returns:
>>
>> [29 Ja
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 10:24 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/28/2015 01:23 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:43 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> >> On 01/12/2015 12:50 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:44 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 12:42 PM
On 01/28/2015 01:23 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:43 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
On 01/12/2015 12:50 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:44 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
On 01/12/2015 12:42 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:39 -0500, Jeremy Moles wro
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:43 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 12:50 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:44 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> >> On 01/12/2015 12:42 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:39 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 12:34 PM
On 01/12/2015 12:50 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:44 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
On 01/12/2015 12:42 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:39 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
On 01/12/2015 12:34 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 11:04 -0500, Jeremy Moles wro
Dan Williams writes:
>> State: LowPowerMode
>> LPM force flags - W_DISABLE:0, User:0, Temp:0, Volt:0, BIOS:1, GOBIIM:0
>> W_DISABLE: 0
>> Poweroff mode: 0
>> LPM Persistent: 0
>
> This says that it's BIOS that is forcing the device to be in low power
> mode. That means that the kernel rfkill dri
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:44 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 12:42 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:39 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> >> On 01/12/2015 12:34 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 11:04 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 10:46 AM
On 01/12/2015 12:42 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:39 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
On 01/12/2015 12:34 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 11:04 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
On 01/12/2015 10:46 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 10:12 -0500, Jeremy Moles wro
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 12:39 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 12:34 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 11:04 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> >> On 01/12/2015 10:46 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 10:12 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 02:24 PM
On 01/12/2015 12:34 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 11:04 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
On 01/12/2015 10:46 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 10:12 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
On 01/09/2015 02:24 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 12:14 -0500, Jeremy Moles wro
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 11:04 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/12/2015 10:46 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 10:12 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> >> On 01/09/2015 02:24 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 12:14 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 12:01 PM
On 01/12/2015 10:46 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 10:12 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
On 01/09/2015 02:24 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 12:14 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
On 01/09/2015 12:01 PM, Jeremy Moles wrote:
Hey everyone! I'm not entirely sure where else to a
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 10:12 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 02:24 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 12:14 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> >> On 01/09/2015 12:01 PM, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> >>> Hey everyone! I'm not entirely sure where else to ask this, and I'm
> >>> somewhat d
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 12:14 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 12:01 PM, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> > Hey everyone! I'm not entirely sure where else to ask this, and I'm
> > somewhat desperate at this point having tried everything I'm capable of.
> >
> > We have a machine here with the card lis
On 01/09/2015 12:16 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 12:01 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
Hey everyone! I'm not entirely sure where else to ask this, and I'm
somewhat desperate at this point having tried everything I'm capable of.
We have a machine here with the card listed in th
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 12:01 -0500, Jeremy Moles wrote:
> Hey everyone! I'm not entirely sure where else to ask this, and I'm
> somewhat desperate at this point having tried everything I'm capable of.
> We have a machine here with the card listed in the subject. It shows up
> in lsusb as:
> 1199:
On 01/09/2015 12:01 PM, Jeremy Moles wrote:
Hey everyone! I'm not entirely sure where else to ask this, and I'm
somewhat desperate at this point having tried everything I'm capable of.
We have a machine here with the card listed in the subject. It shows
up in lsusb as:
1199:901f Sierra Wirel
19 matches
Mail list logo