Re: Specifying an IPv6 suffix

2010-11-10 Thread Marc Herbert
Derek Atkins wrote: > Sure, but in IPv4 there is no implicit tie from the hardware MAC address > to the IP address; you have to arp to see who has it. IPv6 has an equivalent to ARP and does NOT necessarily assume a tie between MAC and IP. This is not a real "tie" but just a default setting for con

Re: Specifying an IPv6 suffix

2010-11-10 Thread Derek Atkins
Marc Herbert writes: > 2010/11/5 Robert Moskowitz : >> It is the principle of the thing.  Yes, if I am changing my prefix I have to >> change the DNS.  But if I am only changing the hardware, why am I having to >> change the DNS? > > Because IPv4 and IPv6 addresses point to network interfaces, no

Re: Specifying an IPv6 suffix

2010-11-08 Thread Marc Herbert
Le 04/11/2010 18:02, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : > Currently I can either have the RA prefix with the MAC address for the > suffix, or I can specify a complete IPv6 address (and gateway) and > ignore RA (doing this manually in the ifcfg-eth0 file as I don't see how > to do this with Network manager)

Re: Specifying an IPv6 suffix

2010-11-06 Thread Marc Herbert
2010/11/5 Robert Moskowitz : > It is the principle of the thing.  Yes, if I am changing my prefix I have to > change the DNS.  But if I am only changing the hardware, why am I having to > change the DNS? Because IPv4 and IPv6 addresses point to network interfaces, not hosts. Unlike DECNet addresse

Re: Specifying an IPv6 suffix

2010-11-05 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 11/05/2010 01:41 PM, José Queiroz wrote: Em 5 de novembro de 2010 15:33, Robert Moskowitz > escreveu: On 11/05/2010 11:00 AM, José Queiroz wrote: 2010/11/5 Marc Herbert mailto:marc.herb...@gmail.com>> PS: this does not look specific to IPv6

Re: Specifying an IPv6 suffix

2010-11-05 Thread José Queiroz
Em 5 de novembro de 2010 15:33, Robert Moskowitz escreveu: > On 11/05/2010 11:00 AM, José Queiroz wrote: > > 2010/11/5 Marc Herbert > > > PS: this does not look specific to IPv6 > > This does not look specific to NetworkManager, as long as NM is working > strictly in the limits created by the R

Re: Specifying an IPv6 suffix

2010-11-05 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 11/05/2010 10:43 AM, Marc Herbert wrote: Le 04/11/2010 18:02, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : I want to control the IPv6 suffix for my interfaces and let the prefix be set with RA. Currently I can either have the RA prefix with the MAC address for the suffix, or I can specify a complete IPv6

Re: Specifying an IPv6 suffix

2010-11-05 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 11/05/2010 11:00 AM, José Queiroz wrote: 2010/11/5 Marc Herbert > PS: this does not look specific to IPv6 This does not look specific to NetworkManager, as long as NM is working strictly in the limits created by the RFCs... The last 64 bits are recommen

Re: Specifying an IPv6 suffix

2010-11-05 Thread José Queiroz
2010/11/5 Marc Herbert > > PS: this does not look specific to IPv6 > > This does not look specific to NetworkManager, as long as NM is working strictly in the limits created by the RFCs... ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.o

Re: Specifying an IPv6 suffix

2010-11-05 Thread Marc Herbert
Le 04/11/2010 18:02, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : > I want to control the IPv6 suffix for my interfaces and let the prefix > be set with RA. > > Currently I can either have the RA prefix with the MAC address for the > suffix, or I can specify a complete IPv6 address (and gateway) and > ignore RA (do

Specifying an IPv6 suffix

2010-11-04 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I want to control the IPv6 suffix for my interfaces and let the prefix be set with RA. Currently I can either have the RA prefix with the MAC address for the suffix, or I can specify a complete IPv6 address (and gateway) and ignore RA (doing this manually in the ifcfg-eth0 file as I don't see how