On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 15:42 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> Well you are essentially correct . startx starts a normal r5 session but
> runlevel claims that the system is still at rl3. Which seems strange to
> me.
I think you're misunderstanding what runlevels are - the fact is,
they're nothing more
Aaron Konstam a écrit :
>
> startx starts a normal r5 session but
> runlevel claims that the system is still at rl3. Which seems strange to
> me.
startx knows nothing about runlevels, it could not care less, that is why the
system _is_ still at runlevel 3. Changing the runlevel starts and stops
Forwarded Message
From: Aaron Konstam
To: Dan Williams
Cc: Marc Herbert , networkmanager-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: debug tips
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:42:53 -0500
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 09:49 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:40 -0500, Aaron Konstam wr
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 09:49 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:40 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:21 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:55 +0100, Marc Herbert wrote:
> > > > Aaron Konstam a écrit :
> > > > > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 0
Aaron Konstam a écrit :
>> Huh? startx is changing the runlevel? That is some news.
> This is a semantic argument. rl3 does not support X, rl5 does.
OK.
> I have never actually checked this but I would be amazed if when one
> runs startx the system does not switch to rl5.
Then be amazed?
I h
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:40 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:21 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:55 +0100, Marc Herbert wrote:
> > > Aaron Konstam a écrit :
> > > > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 08:53 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
> > >
> > > >> As I've said
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:21 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:55 +0100, Marc Herbert wrote:
> > Aaron Konstam a écrit :
> > > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 08:53 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
> >
> > >> As I've said, but let me repeat it again, I do boot into run level 3.
> > >> Aft
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 14:39 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
> > I had a buggy wifi driver and rmmod and ismod on the wifi drivers would
> > always fix my issue.
>
> Thanks a lot, this sounds like potentially fitting my case.
One thing you can also try to help isolate the problem is:
killall -TER
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 10:55 +0100, Marc Herbert wrote:
> Aaron Konstam a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 08:53 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
>
> >> As I've said, but let me repeat it again, I do boot into run level 3.
> >> After logging in I start X manually via startx.
>
> >>> We are having
Aaron Konstam a écrit :
> On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 08:53 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
>> As I've said, but let me repeat it again, I do boot into run level 3.
>> After logging in I start X manually via startx.
>>> We are having a giant miscommunication going on . What rl are you actually
>>> run
ismod, I meant insmod or you can use modprobe, obviously.
--
John
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
> > I had a buggy wifi driver and rmmod and ismod on the wifi drivers would
> > always fix my issue.
>
> Thanks a lot, this sounds like potentially fitting my case.
>
> Chee
> I had a buggy wifi driver and rmmod and ismod on the wifi drivers would
> always fix my issue.
Thanks a lot, this sounds like potentially fitting my case.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Psss, psss, put it down! - http://www.cafepress.com/putitdown
___
NetworkMan
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 08:53 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
> >> >> I'm trying to debug a 100% reproducable issue but don't really know
> >> >> where to look for clues.
> >> >>
> >> >> I have a Sony VAIO VGN-FZ240E, running 64bit Fedora 8.
> >> >>
> >> >> It happens with many wifi networks that whe
I had a buggy wifi driver and rmmod and ismod on the wifi drivers would
always fix my issue.
--
John
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Fetchinson <
fetchin...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >> I'm trying to debug a 100% reproducable issue but don't really know
> >> >> where to look for clues.
>> >> I'm trying to debug a 100% reproducable issue but don't really know
>> >> where to look for clues.
>> >>
>> >> I have a Sony VAIO VGN-FZ240E, running 64bit Fedora 8.
>> >>
>> >> It happens with many wifi networks that when I boot everything goes
>> >> fine, I can connect to the wifi network w
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 09:21 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
> >> I'm trying to debug a 100% reproducable issue but don't really know
> >> where to look for clues.
> >>
> >> I have a Sony VAIO VGN-FZ240E, running 64bit Fedora 8.
> >>
> >> It happens with many wifi networks that when I boot everythin
>> I'm trying to debug a 100% reproducable issue but don't really know
>> where to look for clues.
>>
>> I have a Sony VAIO VGN-FZ240E, running 64bit Fedora 8.
>>
>> It happens with many wifi networks that when I boot everything goes
>> fine, I can connect to the wifi network with nm-applet but as
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 10:49 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm trying to debug a 100% reproducable issue but don't really know
> where to look for clues.
>
> I have a Sony VAIO VGN-FZ240E, running 64bit Fedora 8.
>
> It happens with many wifi networks that when I boot everything
Hi folks,
I'm trying to debug a 100% reproducable issue but don't really know
where to look for clues.
I have a Sony VAIO VGN-FZ240E, running 64bit Fedora 8.
It happens with many wifi networks that when I boot everything goes
fine, I can connect to the wifi network with nm-applet but as soon as
19 matches
Mail list logo
