Cliff Woolley wrote (on apr-dev):
[Is it just me or is it nearly impossible to have a conversation about
Apache or APR that doesn't in some way belong on BOTH lists? sigh]
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Brian Pane wrote:
It's worth noting that half of the apr_table_get calls in
Apache are from mod_mime.
I am getting more than a bit anoyed by the BSD accept filters; when you
have them in a binary; they are always on. And if the setsockopt()
fails things bomb wiht an exit(1).
Which is a bit of a pain if you move them between machines and/or have
kernels which (sometimes) do not have them plugged
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
[clean_child_exit]
It is only called when the child exits and not per-thread. I think the
threads are already dead by that point, or locked-up due to some fatal
error that is the reason why clean_child_exit is being called.
when you say the
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Brian Pane wrote:
So I guess the ideal algorithm for retrieving the initial request
from a client is:
OS with working TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT or equivalent: select first, then read
OS without working TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT or equivalent: read first
isn't it the other way
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
0 Change the 'exit' when the sockopt fails for SO_ACCEPTFILTER
to a warning;.
1 Leave as is; but provide an AcceptFilter on/off directive
to switch it off - if SO_ACCPETFILTER is defined.
2.Have AcceptFitler on/off
dean gaudet wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Brian Pane wrote:
So I guess the ideal algorithm for retrieving the initial request
from a client is:
OS with working TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT or equivalent: select first, then read
OS without working TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT or equivalent: read first
isn't it the
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 07:53:13PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just tagged Apache 2.0.20, and I am rolling it now. It will
be available at http://dev.apache.org/dist/ within the next 30
minutes. Please feel free test and report back the results.
-1 on making this a beta, until
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Daniel Stone wrote:
-1 on making this a beta, until either mod_ssl is a) fixed, b) tagged
experimental/broken/whatever, or c) ripped out.
I though we decided that we WOULD NOT hold up a beta for mod_ssl. (b) is
essentially already done, though perhaps not advertised
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Hiroyuki Hanai wrote:
There is [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CC list of Ryan's mail.
Is this the ML about httpd-pop3?
I've just tried sending subscribing email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but failed.
This was my fault, sorry. It should be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ryan
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
I am getting more than a bit anoyed by the BSD accept filters; when you
have them in a binary; they are always on. And if the setsockopt()
fails things bomb wiht an exit(1).
Which is a bit of a pain if you move them between machines and/or
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
[clean_child_exit]
It is only called when the child exits and not per-thread. I think the
threads are already dead by that point, or locked-up due to some fatal
error that is the reason why
I suggest the mod_ssl patch not go into the source tree for the following
reasons :
(1) the patch is still not complete and doesn't enable anything - as most of
the hooks are in the #if 0 ... #endif block
(2) is not fully tested (at all)
(3) it's pretty risky to apply such a patch on to the cvs
Not to start a flame war, but isn't MOD_TLS, while not perfect, is there and
useable from what I understand.
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Tuesday 10 July 2001 00:59, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Then do a graceful restart.
You can see the server shifting itself around as the new processes come up
and the old ones go down... but for some reason three workers with
generations 3, 4,
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Gonyou, Austin wrote:
Not to start a flame war, but isn't MOD_TLS, while not perfect, is there and
useable from what I understand.
mod_tls implements the SSL filtering logic, but it doesn't try to
implement the surrounding logic that a true SSL module requires. The idea
Hello all!
I have a good experience designing portals and big websites, but I
want start now a good site, and I've thunk that perhaps Apache modules can
be the best aproach to this problem.
My idea:
designers write templates using specific tags, like shop, advert
code=1 or
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Greg Ames wrote:
Then do a graceful restart.
You can see the server shifting itself around as the new processes come up
and the old ones go down... but for some reason three workers with
generations 3, 4, and 5
Aaahh..so that means they really are dependant pieces. mod_tls doesn't
depend on anything, but it's filters will not be used unless mod_ssl is
there, and vice versa. Gotcha.
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Carlos Costa Portela wrote:
My idea:
designers write templates using specific tags, like shop, advert
code=1 or similar.
a program parses the template and call to another programs to process
tags.
You could write a custom extension to mod_include to do this. With 2.0
On 10 Jul 2001 16:56:07 -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Carlos Costa Portela wrote:
My idea:
designers write templates using specific tags, like shop, advert
code=1 or similar.
a program parses the template and call to another programs to process
tags.
You could
Hi Apache2.0 devs: On HP-UX, we are facing a problem whose symptoms are
similar to the one seen with 2.0.19 release. Upon starting Apache, the
number of processes running reduces to 2. Upon further investigation, it
looked like the main process (watchdog process) went on a rampage and killed
We am running apache 1.3.17 with mod_ssl under AIX 4.2.1. We have a fast
CGI app, written in C, that has been running well for app 2 months. Now,
twice in the last two days, one of the apache tasks suddenly started using
huge amounts of memory. Eventually all of the paging space is used the
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jack Gostl wrote:
We am running apache 1.3.17 with mod_ssl under AIX 4.2.1. We have a fast
CGI app, written in C, that has been running well for app 2 months. Now,
twice in the last two days, one of the apache tasks suddenly started using
huge amounts of memory.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jack Gostl wrote:
We am running apache 1.3.17 with mod_ssl under AIX 4.2.1. We have a fast
CGI app, written in C, that has been running well for app 2 months. Now,
twice in the last two days, one of the apache tasks suddenly
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Another reason why apr_hash_t isn't a good match for HTTP headers
is that the same field name may appear multiple times in the request
or response headers (section 4.2 of RFC 2616), but the hash table
implementation is designed around unique keys.
HTTP headers were
Brian,
Committed your most recent revision of this patch. Please review it as I had to hand
merge about
half of the chunks. You should consider Dean's suggestions as well.
Bill
Here's my proposed patch that replaces the tables with a hash table.
--Brian
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Thu, Jun
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 00:11:37 -0400
From: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Cliff Woolley' [EMAIL PROTECTED],
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Yes. That is the expected behaviour if a timeout is set. But, I haven't set
any timeout currently - so the read blocks till it receives some data OR the
connection is dropped. I verified that the chunk_filter (http_core.c) also
uses a APR_BLOCK_READ
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Brian Pane wrote:
1. Add a 2nd create function for apr_hash_t that lets the caller
supply three callback functions:
- a hash function
- an equality-check function
- a concatenation function (if non-NULL, setting x=y followed by
x=y results
29 matches
Mail list logo
