On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 13:10, Richie de Almeida wrote:
> On Monday 06 August 2001 21:43, Michael Leone wrote:
> > From: Sridhar Dhanapalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > >Linux has had IPv6 support for quite some time, and I beleive that
> > >Win2K has it as well (because they stole the TCP/IP stac
On Monday 06 August 2001 21:43, Michael Leone wrote:
> From: Sridhar Dhanapalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Linux has had IPv6 support for quite some time, and I beleive that
> >Win2K has it as well (because they stole the TCP/IP stack from
> > FreeBSD).
>
> They did NOT steal it. The license
On Monday 06 August 2001 21:43, Michael Leone wrote:
> From: Sridhar Dhanapalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Linux has had IPv6 support for quite some time, and I beleive that
> >Win2K has it as well (because they stole the TCP/IP stack from
> > FreeBSD).
>
> They did NOT steal it. The license
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:43, Michael Leone wrote:
> From: Sridhar Dhanapalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Linux has had IPv6 support for quite some time, and I beleive that
> >Win2K has it as well (because they stole the TCP/IP stack from
> > FreeBSD).
>
> They did NOT steal it. The license ALLOW
From: Sridhar Dhanapalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Linux has had IPv6 support for quite some time, and I beleive that
>Win2K has it as well (because they stole the TCP/IP stack from
> FreeBSD).
They did NOT steal it. The license ALLOWED them to use it. It was
perfectly legal, if a bit hypocritical.
Somebody sent this to me today, as he and I usually discuss varied
technical issues, and in reading, I thought this was something the
groups may like to see. If you've already seen it or commented on, I
apologize for the waisted bandwith, but I think this is worth
distributing.
http://www.pbs.or
