On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 14:32, rikona wrote:
Hello Technoslick,
Sunday, June 15, 2003, 7:31:07 AM, you wrote:
T I have a Linksys router/gateway that has the ability to dynamically
T open ports and port ranges when a certain executable is requesting
T to do so from a network client. This has
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 18:36, FemmeFatale wrote:
At 06:23 PM 6/15/2003 -0400, you wrote:
snip
but it makes no
sense for me to manually open ports 1024-65535 and then just as manually
shut them down after a chat or video conference session when I have the
ability to let the router do it
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 18:40, FemmeFatale wrote:
snip
Rikona has hit it. ICQ does this as well it seems as if you look on the
net ICQ tries to use / request (I joke not) 64,000 *yes THOUSAND*
Ports! jesus... no wonder IT security guys hate ICQ.
*If* you want to have chat sessions, and audio
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 00:31, Technoslick wrote:
I've got LICQ configured on my MDK 9.1 workstation with my ICQ accounts.
I tried to open the needed ports on my router for a full chat session,
but it doesn't seem to be working. I cannot create a peer-to-peer chat
session, just IM. Obviously,
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 07:34, Anne Wilson wrote:
Linux isn't going to necessarily TELL you what program wants to use
a port - just that a port is requesting to be opened. Just force
open the ICQ ports and you should be right.
How do you do that, Stephen?
Anne
With the understanding
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 17:08, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 00:31, Technoslick wrote:
I've got LICQ configured on my MDK 9.1 workstation with my ICQ accounts.
I tried to open the needed ports on my router for a full chat session,
but it doesn't seem to be working. I cannot
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 19:40, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 08:23, Technoslick wrote:
So, what do you think? If 'licq' is running, is *it* requesting the
ports or some other supporting program? If the latter, any idea what
that/they might be? I would have thought someone using
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 19:45, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 08:46, Technoslick wrote:
Untrue, Stephen.
Every application that communicates through a port, or series of ports,
has a signature, for lack of a better term. It's best to explain
through the Windows end just
