http://www.computerworld.com/newsletter/0,4902,90853,00.html?nlid=LIN
and
http://www.computerworld.com/newsletter/0,4902,90868,00.html?nlid=LIN
--
02:21:45 up 3 days, 9:45, running Mandrake Linux release 10.0 (Community) for
i586, kernel 2.6.2-3mdk
Registered Linux user #324360
Bloom's
On March 10, 2004 04:23 am, Glenn wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com/newsletter/0,4902,90853,00.html?nlid=LIN
and
http://www.computerworld.com/newsletter/0,4902,90868,00.html?nlid=LIN
Gee! What a total surprise this is! Grin! I'm pretty sure that someone on this
list, and others in a
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 08:57 am, Lanman wrote:
Gee! What a total surprise this is! Grin! I'm pretty sure that someone on
this list, and others in a variety of publications suggested that SCO would
change from being a Unix/Linux solutions provider to a company specializing
in litigation.
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 15:32, Bryan Phinney wrote:
snip
The one bright spot about all of this is that the US is rapidly
providing a shining example of why our IP and copyright models
are antiquated and no longer serving their original purpose.
This makes it more likely that other
Bryan Phinney wrote:
The one bright spot about all of this is that the US is rapidly providing a shining example of why our IP and copyright models are antiquated and no longer serving their original purpose. This makes it more likely that other countries will hopefully form their own systems
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 07:32 am, Bryan Phinney wrote:
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 08:57 am, Lanman wrote:
Gee! What a total surprise this is! Grin! I'm pretty sure that someone on
this list, and others in a variety of publications suggested that SCO
would change from being a Unix/Linux
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:17:55 -0800
Aron Smith disseminated the following:
The one bright spot about all of this is that the US is rapidly providing a
shining example of why our IP and copyright models are antiquated and no
longer serving their original purpose. This makes it more likely
John Richard Smith wrote:
Bryan Phinney wrote:
The one bright spot about all of this is that the US is rapidly
providing a shining example of why our IP and copyright models are
antiquated and no longer serving their original purpose. This makes
it more likely that other countries will
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 02:51 pm, Margot wrote:
The original purpose of patenting and copy write was to protect
original and novel ideas for the purpose of rewarding their creators.
It has long since been clear to me that the purpose today is to create
blocks to widespread use of that
