Re: [newbie] Can't start X, "No Devices"

2003-11-03 Thread HaywireMac
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:55:45 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: > What does it mean when X claims "No devices found"? Does that mean it > can't find the videocard or that it can't find a window manager? It can't find a server to connect to, ie. no X server. Normally it would default to device :0, b

Re: [newbie] Can't start X, "No Devices"

2003-11-03 Thread Max . Benitz
HaywireMac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@linux-mandrake.com on 11/03/2003 11:26:48 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: [newbie] Can't start X, "No Devices" On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 10:51:01 -0800 Aronsm

Re: [newbie] Can't start X, "No Devices"

2003-11-03 Thread HaywireMac
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 10:51:01 -0800 Aronsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered: > Did you try F-10 on boot , that will access the bios on most Compaq's I had the same machine, there ain't no way in hell you are going to access the BIOS without the proper util from the Compaq site. They have floppy imag

Re: [newbie] Can't start X, "No Devices"

2003-11-03 Thread Aronsmith
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 09:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Fellow Linux users, > > I'm trying to sell a Compaq Deskpro 2000 (Pentium 200MMX w/96M RAM, 1M > Video), and I have a buyer if I can get Linux on it. The thing works fine > under Win 98, Win ME, Win Pro. Under Linux my first hurdle was the

[newbie] Can't start X, "No Devices"

2003-11-03 Thread Max . Benitz
Fellow Linux users, I'm trying to sell a Compaq Deskpro 2000 (Pentium 200MMX w/96M RAM, 1M Video), and I have a buyer if I can get Linux on it. The thing works fine under Win 98, Win ME, Win Pro. Under Linux my first hurdle was the sudden appearance of a bad track, resolved by installing the HD