Re: [newbie] I LIKE rpmdrake 2.1

2003-02-14 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 16:14, Kaj Haulrich wrote: > On Friday 14 February 2003 07:48 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote: > > On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:47 pm, civileme wrote: > > > Another option for the tab-top UI is to make it > > > callable under another name like rpmdrakexaphir. It > > > should take

Re: [newbie] I LIKE rpmdrake 2.1

2003-02-14 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Friday 14 February 2003 07:48 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote: > On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:47 pm, civileme wrote: > > Another option for the tab-top UI is to make it > > callable under another name like rpmdrakexaphir. It > > should take only a couple hours working from the > > python-gtk demo t

Re: [newbie] I LIKE rpmdrake 2.1

2003-02-14 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:47 pm, civileme wrote: > Another option for the tab-top UI is to make it callable under another name > like rpmdrakexaphir. It should take only a couple hours working from the > python-gtk demo to do a tabbed screen that invokes each of the functions... > errr Pyth

Re: [newbie] I LIKE rpmdrake 2.1

2003-02-13 Thread civileme
On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:46 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote: > On Thursday 13 February 2003 02:31 pm, civileme wrote: > > So if they want to make four interfaces to simplify user confusion and > > tech support (both in diagnosis and advice), why not? I still see all > > four with my method of look

[newbie] I LIKE rpmdrake 2.1

2003-02-13 Thread civileme
Well I don't have the frustration Lyvim was talking about since I start DrakConf from an Eterm Su'ed to root. I can see the operation of any of the four components. 1. You cannot be using more than one of the functions at a time 2. Tech support is MUCH easier 3. Error recovery is much bette