On Sunday 17 June 2001 09:22 pm, s wrote:
Well, naw, but it's cool he switched. I was just mentioning it
because Tom said Steve was unwise to use windows for a server.
-s
No, I said I lack faith in any security expert who would choose the
most insecure server available, Winblows.
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Saturday 16 June 2001 03:52 pm, root wrote:
ipchains has been improved (long ago). 2.4.x kernels have iptables
support. Check to make sure iptables is installed (updated,
iptables-1.2.2-2mdk), and then run DrakConf as root and answer the few,
On Sunday 17 June 2001 02:32 am, Ross Slade wrote:
ipchains has been improved (long ago). 2.4.x kernels have
iptables support. Check to make sure iptables is installed
(updated, iptables-1.2.2-2mdk), and then run DrakConf as root and
answer the few,
Is iptable's command format
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 18:59, Tom Brinkman wrote:
Whatever, when you believe you've got it right, then try scans:
https://grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2 [probly not worth the time since
this 'expert' got hacked and shut down a few weeks ago. So much for
their security ; ]
Steve Gibson (the
I totally agree ! He also found some major bugs and spyware in Netscape
Navigator, which they denied, then threatened to sue Steve, until he proved
it. At this point, the folks from Netscape quietly apologised, and fixed the
holes, etc with Netscape 4.76 !
Anyone who criticizes Steve is
He has recently moved his site and ngs to a unix server (after the recent DoS
attacks). So I guess he's catching on. :-)
-s
On Sunday 17 June 2001 10:52 am, you wrote:
Personally, I lack faith in any security 'expert' that chooses to
run his site on the most insecure server available,
Well, naw, but it's cool he switched. I was just mentioning it because Tom
said Steve was unwise to use windows for a server.
-s
On Sunday 17 June 2001 05:53 pm, you wrote:
s wrote:
He has recently moved his site and ngs to a unix server (after the recent
DoS attacks). So I guess he's
s wrote:
He has recently moved his site and ngs to a unix server (after the recent DoS
attacks). So I guess he's catching on. :-)
Can Linux protect him from a DoS attack?
Randy Kramer
Well, actually he thinks it might help. Something about better filters since
he has the attacker's ip addys (and the hijacked machines they used), in
addition to a something similar to portsentry's methodology. I don't
remember all the details, but it's on his site and in his ngs. However,
The 2.4 kernel uses iptables, no?
Steve
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 03:52:20PM -0500, root wrote:
Where the heck is the ipchains command... Using an install of LM8.0 on
medium security. Looked in /usr/sbin and all over the place but seems to
be afk...
--- root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where the heck is the ipchains command... Using an
install of LM8.0 on
medium security. Looked in /usr/sbin and all over
the place but seems to
be afk...
After 'modprobe ipchains' it's in /sbin/ipchains for
me. I'm using a pretty stock 8.0 install.
On Saturday 16 June 2001 03:52 pm, root wrote:
Where the heck is the ipchains command... Using an install of LM8.0
on medium security. Looked in /usr/sbin and all over the place but
seems to be afk...
ipchains has been improved (long ago). 2.4.x kernels have iptables
support. Check to
12 matches
Mail list logo
