it depends really. I usually go through and remove kernel support for
everything that I don't have/use. This and the processor optimizations
usually give me a little bit of performance increase. The last time I
did it I benchmarked quake3 before and after. There was a 15fps
increase with the n
Would this really make a difference in speed/performance? Most of what I've
read regarding kernel recompiles say that there's not much to be gained from
it.
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:36, abe wrote:
> with the 2.2.x series you can use PPro. If your using the 2.4.x kernel
> there is a K7 optimizati
with the 2.2.x series you can use PPro. If your using the 2.4.x kernel
there is a K7 optimization option.
"Blomquist, Niklas" wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Witch kernel optimizations should I use for a AMD Athlon?
>
> /Niklas
Hello!
Witch kernel optimizations should I use for a AMD Athlon?
/Niklas
Linux Mandrake 6.0 is said to be optimized for Pentium-type processors.
This means that it was compiled using pgcc instead of gcc, correct? So if I
wanted to compile a custom kernel (i.e. include NTFS support) I'm guessing
that I should use pgcc instead of gcc, to keep the optimizations.