Re: [newbie] No manual entry for XXXX for non-root users

2004-03-13 Thread et
On Friday 12 March 2004 11:33 pm, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: On Mar 12, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Alaa The Great wrote: msec will probably change it back so I will probably have to figure out again (for the 3rd or 4th time) how to manipulate the msec tables :-) to get it to stick But

Re: [newbie] No manual entry for XXXX for non-root users

2004-03-12 Thread Hoyt Bailey
On Friday 12 March 2004 02:04 pm, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: On Mar 12, 2004, at 1:06 PM, Ronald J. Hall wrote: Okay, I did a ls -al /usr/bin/man here and got the same file permissions so I guess we struck out there. Next. What security level did he install at? I'm using

Re: [newbie] No manual entry for XXXX for non-root users

2004-03-12 Thread Alaa The Great
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:04:31 -0700 Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: msec will probably change it back so I will probably have to figure out again (for the 3rd or 4th time) how to manipulate the msec tables :-) to get it to

Re: [newbie] No manual entry for XXXX for non-root users

2004-03-12 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire . Net LLC
On Mar 12, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Alaa The Great wrote: msec will probably change it back so I will probably have to figure out again (for the 3rd or 4th time) how to manipulate the msec tables :-) to get it to stick But should /usr/share/man be owned by rpm:rpm? yeah for some strange reason