On Sun, 08 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> >from a bit over 8 hrs, to about 9 1/2 hrs. That's about an 18 or 19 % change
>
> Interestingly enough my machine now does 5 wu's in 2 days, compared to 4
> in 2 days with version 2.4
>
Probably got a "fast wu" or 2 in there over the last few days.
--
Alex
It was Oct 8, 2000, 10:20, when A V Flinsch keyboarded:
>The combined effect of FFT optimization, pulse detection, and the
>extended doppler drift range is that a typical workunit will take about
>40% longer to complete with version 3.0 on any given platform. On
Yes, I saw that too.
>Personally
On Sun, 08 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> Look what I found at http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/version30.html:
>
> Optimization of the FFT computation. We have adopted the highly optimized
> Ooura FFT routines developed at the University of Tokyo. Our tests show a
> 60% client speed up over version 2.x wi
Look what I found at http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/version30.html:
Optimization of the FFT computation. We have adopted the highly optimized
Ooura FFT routines developed at the University of Tokyo. Our tests show a
60% client speed up over version 2.x with a a 4% sacrifice in memory
consumption
