Did I ask for your grammatical character assassination!? NO!
However, ty for correcting my technical assessment of the situation. :)
Femme
Gerald Waugh wrote:
>
> On Friday 22 March 2002 11:07 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
> > I cannot in all conscience see why your USB Ports would screw up linux.
>
Hi folks,
G!!!
Turning bright green with envy, descending into purple
gloom.
It's a great day if my M$ box stays up for 10 hours!! :-)
Not counting simple program lockups, of course.
Would be interesting to see who has the record on the list for keeping a
M
On Friday 22 March 2002 11:07 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
> I cannot in all conscience see why your USB Ports would screw up linux.
>
> For logs, try var/logs *its under the root partition*. Therein they may
> lie.
>
> GL? *praying my info here is accurate!*
> Femme
close the logs (plural) are in /v
On Friday 22 March 2002 10:43 pm, Greg wrote:
> One of the things it does is lock up after it sits for a few days without
> being used Another thing is the task bar in KDE disappears if it has not
> been rebooted for awhile I am thinking it might have some thing to do with
> my USB ports which do
I cannot in all conscience see why your USB Ports would screw up linux.
For logs, try var/logs *its under the root partition*. Therein they may
lie.
GL? *praying my info here is accurate!*
Femme
Greg wrote:
>
> One of the things it does is lock up after it sits for a few days without being u
One of the things it does is lock up after it sits for a few days without being used
Another thing is the task bar in KDE disappears if it has not been rebooted for awhile
I am thinking it might have some thing to do with my USB ports which do not work
I am too new to Linux I dont know where th
On Thursday 21 March 2002 08:49 pm, Greg wrote:
> >On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Greg wrote:
> >> >%_I never had much luck leaving the system running The most i could
> >> > get was a week or to two weeks then the system would either be locked
> >> > or would act funny until I rebooted Greg
> I dont k
I dont know what to check Everything works good for awhile Any ideas Greg
Gerald Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Greg wrote:
>> >%_I never had much luck leaving the system running The most i could get was a
>week or to two weeks then the system would either be locke
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Greg wrote:
> >%_I never had much luck leaving the system running The most i could get was a
>week or to two weeks then the system would either be locked or would act funny until
>I rebooted Greg
Then there is something wrong with your system.
I have systems that have b
FemmeFatale wrote:
>
> *S* old debate...don't stir up the old hardware geeks :P
>
> IMHO, leave it on. Less stress on the HW.
I'd leave it on as each time you power down you are causing the
components in use to cool and shrink. When you power up again they
expand again and of course heat up. Th
I never had much luck leaving the system running The most i could get was a week or
to two weeks then the system would either be locked or would act funny until I
rebooted Greg
FemmeFatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>*S* old debate...don't stir up the old hardware geeks :P
>
>IMHO, leave it
*S* old debate...don't stir up the old hardware geeks :P
IMHO, leave it on. Less stress on the HW.
Femme
Stojs wrote:
>
> I know this is out of topic, but with linux I have the choice not to
> turn the computers off or restart them to often.
>
> What is best for the psu, having the computer
I know this is out of topic, but with linux I have the choice not to
turn the computers off or restart them to often.
What is best for the psu, having the computer running constantly or
turning it off everytime you don´t use it (several times a day)?
Thanks in advance,
Stojs
Want to buy you
13 matches
Mail list logo
