So I was right. I was expecting pdksh, though (the Public Domain Korn
SHell).
It appears that the maillist switched the order of my two posts.
Yes, the demonic mailer daemon strikes again...
Yes, Korn
Shell. In my experience pdksh is not a good substitute for ksh (although
my
--
Shells,
Redirection
--
The shell provides the Command Line Interface that you see
in Linux/UNIX. The shell accepts your input, processes it,
and takes appropriate actions, interfacing with the kernel
and the filesystem as necessary.
The BASH shell was based
When you encounter an error detected by the shell, it is
normally flagged by the shell. In this example, the shell
is Korn Shell, and the shell designation is "ksh":
$ thisfile
-ksh: thisfile: cannot execute [Permission denied]
So I was right. I was expecting pdksh, though (the Public
From: Andy Goth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alternately, you can call a shell and tell it to run the shell script
file. "sh printpwd" should do the trick... is this right? In most
shells, ". printpwd" (notice the period) will run a shell script as
Both of those will run a script, but there's a
From: Dan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andy Goth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alternately, you can call a shell and tell it to run the shell
script
file. "sh printpwd" should do the trick... is this right? In most
shells, ". printpwd" (notice the period) will run a shell script as
Both of
$ thisfile
-ksh: thisfile: cannot execute [Permission denied]
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Andy Goth wrote:
So I was right. I was expecting pdksh, though (the Public Domain Korn
SHell).
It appears that the maillist switched the order of my two posts. Yes, Korn
Shell. In my experience pdksh is
