I have two Linux boxes on my network here at home. Both are P2-400's
and the only real difference is RAM. One machine has 256 MG the other
128. But they both run pretty damn fast!
Now there are somethings that I've noticed, heard, and/or experimented
with, and that's separate hard drives for c
LM 7.2 runs just fine on my ThinkPad laptop, 366 Celeron with 64 MB of
memory. If you are having sluggish performance, you might look into
disabling some services which you rarely or never use, possibly remove
some fonts or have them load dynamically rather than automatically at
boot, etc.
Al
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: Saturday, 17 February 2001 3:21 AM
To: LinuxNewbie (E-mail)
Subject: [newbie] What would be an ideal (but reasonable) LM7.2 desktop
platform
Just wondering, without spendning a fortune what would be the ideal platform
for running LM 7.2
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: Saturday, 17 February 2001 3:21 AM
To: LinuxNewbie (E-mail)
Subject: [newbie] What would be an ideal (but reasonable) LM7.2 desktop
platform
Just wondering, without spendning a fortune what would be the ideal platform
for running LM 7.2 (KDE/GNOME)?
I ask
Just wondering, without spendning a fortune what would be the ideal platform
for running LM 7.2 (KDE/GNOME)?
I ask this because I'm running 7.2 on a K6-200/128MB and on a P400/256MB and
they are both sluggish. How much machine to I need to run a typical
installation of 7.2, I was planning on upg
