Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Sunday 20 June 2004 10:32 am, OOzy wrote:
I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I
clicked yes. Is that a problem? Please see below
urpmi libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm
The following packages have bad signatures:
libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm:
robin wrote:
Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Sunday 20 June 2004 10:32 am, OOzy wrote:
I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I
clicked yes. Is that a problem? Please see below
urpmi libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm
The following packages have bad signatures:
Em Ter, 2004-06-22 às 17:04, Mikkel L. Ellertson escreveu:
robin wrote:
Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Sunday 20 June 2004 10:32 am, OOzy wrote:
I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I
clicked yes. Is that a problem? Please see below
urpmi
I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I clicked
yes. Is that a problem? Please see below
urpmi libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm
The following packages have bad signatures:
libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm: Invalid signature ((SHA1) DSA sha1 md5
(GPG) (MISSING KEY)
Op Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:32:09 +0300 schreef OOzy:
I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I clicked
yes. Is that a problem? Please see below
I installed loads of stuff with urpmi too, on MDK10 official. Almost all
of them gave me this similar message. And none of them had a
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 01:32, OOzy wrote:
I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I clicked
yes. Is that a problem? Please see below
urpmi libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm
The following packages have bad signatures:
libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm: Invalid signature
Hi,
Some rpms on disc (downloaded ver) and from update mirror have bad
signatures - choice install or cancell...
Should install or cancell - what will happen if install?
Kindly some pointers here please
Thanks
--
Johan
May this be a good day for learning
Registered Linux User #330034
Want to
On Monday 27 October 2003 04:19 pm, Johan wrote:
Hi,
Some rpms on disc (downloaded ver) and from update mirror have bad
signatures - choice install or cancell...
Should install or cancell - what will happen if install?
Kindly some pointers here please
Thanks
If you did an upgrade install,
On Monday 27 October 2003 04:19 pm, Johan wrote:
Hi,
Some rpms on disc (downloaded ver) and from update mirror have bad
signatures - choice install or cancell...
Should install or cancell - what will happen if install?
Kindly some pointers here please
Thanks
Usually you would just click
I just installed the wallpaper-0.1-3tex.i586.rpm from texstar, and when I urpmi'd
the package, I was told that it had a bad signature, and asked if I wanted to
continue anyway. Just what does it mean that the signature was bad? Why would a
package from tex have a bad sig?
I went ahead and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 17 October 2002 9:20 am, Angus Auld did speak unto the huddled
masses, saying:
I just installed the wallpaper-0.1-3tex.i586.rpm from texstar, and when
I urpmi'd the package, I was told that it had a bad signature, and
asked if I
On Thursday 17 October 2002 9:20 am, Angus Auld did speak unto the huddled
masses, saying:
I just installed the wallpaper-0.1-3tex.i586.rpm from texstar, and when
I urpmi'd the package, I was told that it had a bad signature, and
asked if I wanted to continue anyway. Just what does it
12 matches
Mail list logo