Re: [newbie] Bad signature

2004-06-22 Thread robin
Tom Brinkman wrote: On Sunday 20 June 2004 10:32 am, OOzy wrote: I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I clicked yes. Is that a problem? Please see below urpmi libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm The following packages have bad signatures: libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm:

Re: [newbie] Bad signature

2004-06-22 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
robin wrote: Tom Brinkman wrote: On Sunday 20 June 2004 10:32 am, OOzy wrote: I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I clicked yes. Is that a problem? Please see below urpmi libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm The following packages have bad signatures:

Re: [newbie] Bad signature

2004-06-22 Thread Josenildo Marques
Em Ter, 2004-06-22 às 17:04, Mikkel L. Ellertson escreveu: robin wrote: Tom Brinkman wrote: On Sunday 20 June 2004 10:32 am, OOzy wrote: I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I clicked yes. Is that a problem? Please see below urpmi

[newbie] Bad signature

2004-06-20 Thread OOzy
I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I clicked yes. Is that a problem? Please see below urpmi libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm The following packages have bad signatures: libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm: Invalid signature ((SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) (MISSING KEY)

Re: [newbie] Bad signature

2004-06-20 Thread Paul
Op Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:32:09 +0300 schreef OOzy: I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I clicked yes. Is that a problem? Please see below I installed loads of stuff with urpmi too, on MDK10 official. Almost all of them gave me this similar message. And none of them had a

Re: [newbie] Bad signature

2004-06-20 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 01:32, OOzy wrote: I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I clicked yes. Is that a problem? Please see below urpmi libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm The following packages have bad signatures: libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm: Invalid signature

[newbie] bad signature

2003-10-27 Thread Johan
Hi, Some rpms on disc (downloaded ver) and from update mirror have bad signatures - choice install or cancell... Should install or cancell - what will happen if install? Kindly some pointers here please Thanks -- Johan May this be a good day for learning Registered Linux User #330034 Want to

Re: [newbie] bad signature

2003-10-27 Thread Greg Meyer
On Monday 27 October 2003 04:19 pm, Johan wrote: Hi, Some rpms on disc (downloaded ver) and from update mirror have bad signatures - choice install or cancell... Should install or cancell - what will happen if install? Kindly some pointers here please Thanks If you did an upgrade install,

Re: [newbie] bad signature

2003-10-27 Thread Scott Naylor
On Monday 27 October 2003 04:19 pm, Johan wrote: Hi, Some rpms on disc (downloaded ver) and from update mirror have bad signatures - choice install or cancell... Should install or cancell - what will happen if install? Kindly some pointers here please Thanks Usually you would just click

[newbie] bad signature..........tex??

2002-10-17 Thread Angus Auld
I just installed the wallpaper-0.1-3tex.i586.rpm from texstar, and when I urpmi'd the package, I was told that it had a bad signature, and asked if I wanted to continue anyway. Just what does it mean that the signature was bad? Why would a package from tex have a bad sig? I went ahead and

Re: [newbie] bad signature..........tex??

2002-10-17 Thread shane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 17 October 2002 9:20 am, Angus Auld did speak unto the huddled masses, saying: I just installed the wallpaper-0.1-3tex.i586.rpm from texstar, and when I urpmi'd the package, I was told that it had a bad signature, and asked if I

Re: [newbie] bad signature..........tex??

2002-10-17 Thread Angus Auld
On Thursday 17 October 2002 9:20 am, Angus Auld did speak unto the huddled masses, saying: I just installed the wallpaper-0.1-3tex.i586.rpm from texstar, and when I urpmi'd the package, I was told that it had a bad signature, and asked if I wanted to continue anyway. Just what does it