Re: [newbie] general opinions about file servers and firewalls

2003-11-18 Thread Michael Adams
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:57:28 + et [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: my .02$usd.. MUCH better Idea to have a separate box for firewall/router, and keep files on and inside box... Mandrakes mnf 'should' *be the ticket* for that firewall box, and 9.1 or 9.2 is fine for the fileserver. Actually the

Re: [newbie] general opinions about file servers and firewalls

2003-11-17 Thread Derek Jennings
On Monday 17 Nov 2003 4:55 am, Sharrea Day wrote: On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:02, Richard Babcock wrote: Greetings everyone, I am currently using ML 9.1 and shorewall with a 160g hd as both file server and firewall. It occurs to me that this could be a flawed design or at least one inviting

Re: [newbie] general opinions about file servers and firewalls

2003-11-17 Thread et
On Monday 17 November 2003 09:36 am, Derek Jennings wrote: On Monday 17 Nov 2003 4:55 am, Sharrea Day wrote: On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:02, Richard Babcock wrote: Greetings everyone, I am currently using ML 9.1 and shorewall with a 160g hd as both file server and firewall. It occurs to me

Re: [newbie] general opinions about file servers and firewalls

2003-11-17 Thread gavin
On Monday 17 November 2003 01:02 pm, Richard Babcock wrote: Greetings everyone, I am currently using ML 9.1 and shorewall with a 160g hd as both file server and firewall. It occurs to me that this could be a flawed design or at least one inviting trouble. For example, if one machine fails I