-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 28 Jul 2002 1:45 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
I admire your persistence to save the home an' hearth ;) First, IMO,
current 9.0 KDE3.0.2 is much better than any of the available 'KDE3.x'
upgrades for 8.x. As is Gnome2, so why try'n save
On Sunday July 28 2002 02:29 am, Alastair Scott wrote:
On Sunday 28 Jul 2002 1:45 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
I admire your persistence to save the home an' hearth ;) First,
IMO, current 9.0 KDE3.0.2 is much better than any of the available
'KDE3.x' upgrades for 8.x. As is Gnome2, so why
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 08:29, Tom Brinkman wrote:
In early June I saved a copy of 8.2's /home/tom to a storage
partition and did a fresh install of 8.3/9.0 (the 6/6/02 'alpha'
release). Immediately after the install, I copied the 8.2 /home backup
into 9.0, which instantly broke the
I ask about the bugs in the beta then had to leave town
for a few days but did have time to wonder since I,m
useing 8.2 can I do a upgrade booting from the CD-ROM are
is it better to do a clean install. JOE
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to
]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 11:02 AM
Subject: [newbie] upgradeing to 9.0 beta
I ask about the bugs in the beta then had to leave town
for a few days but did have time to wonder since I,m
useing 8.2 can I do a upgrade booting from the CD-ROM are
is it better to do a clean install. JOE
On Saturday July 27 2002 10:02 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ask about the bugs in the beta then had to leave town
for a few days but did have time to wonder since I,m
useing 8.2 can I do a upgrade booting from the CD-ROM are
is it better to do a clean install. JOE
A fresh install is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 27 Jul 2002 7:55 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
A fresh install is always the better option, often less time
consumming and better results than a (theoretically maybe possible)
upgrade. 'Sides, it's probly time to do some house cleanin
On Saturday July 27 2002 02:14 pm, Alastair Scott wrote:
On Saturday 27 Jul 2002 7:55 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
Cooker/9.0 is very dynamic now (ie, beta2 [current cooker] isn't
compatible with 9.0beta1). Many gcc (- 3.2) and lib changes. I'd
say only a fresh install is feasible. Further,
