Frankie wrote:
Something else you might want to consider
its possible that this has been planned years ago..
SCO could have done it themselves, slowly, patch by patch.. not directly of
course...
they may have had this planed with microsnot long ago.
rgds
Franki
-Original Message-
From:
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 23:03, Jonathan Shilling wrote:
> h.
> I could have swore that the courts had decided that too much of the code in
> Unix could be attributed to others, and that very little remained of what
> AT&T had originally developed, but I could very well be wrong. I also
> tho
Interesting to note that SCO states the code stolen is from sys V. If I
rememeber correctly system V could only run on a single processor system,
and that much of its code was stolen from Berkley and FreeBSD. Anyone else
care to look back to the case where one of the previous owners of the Unix
s
