Would it not be easier to urpme the gtk and then urpmi the gtk
specifying the newer version in the command line?
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
: [newbie] D4X Compile
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:07:25 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what should I do then,
a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my
d4x on M9.0
Have you tried rebuilding d4x Since you did
if I send you a CD with all the MDK 9.1
updates on.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
Tony S. Sykes wrote:
Would it not be easier to urpme the gtk and then urpmi
? It might be easier if I send you a CD with all the MDK 9.1 updates on.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
Tony S. Sykes wrote:
Would it not be easier to urpme
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:29:51 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you help me once more and give me the precise url for
d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm
ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/
or you ca use another
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:03:13 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going
to have to be updated somehow ?
John I am running the same versions as you on my 9.1 system.
It is more apt that 1 are all of your gtk+2 rpms
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:03:13 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going
to have to be updated somehow ?
Nah, could be that the D4X package is looking in the wrong place for
your GTK libs. It shouldn't be doing this
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:03:13 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going
to have to be updated somehow ?
John I am running the same versions as you on my 9.1 system.
It is more apt that 1
JoeHill wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:03:13 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
So it looks to me as though my version of the gtk libraries is going
to have to be updated somehow ?
Nah, could be that the D4X package is looking in the wrong place for
your GTK libs. It
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:07:25 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what should I do then,
a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my
d4x on M9.0
Have you tried rebuilding d4x Since you did the --force install of gtk?
Hell, if it comes to it I can send
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:07:25 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what should I do then,
a urpmi , or better still where can I download pucka version with my
d4x on M9.0
Have you tried rebuilding d4x Since you did the --force install of gtk?
Hell,
FemmeFatale wrote:
At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel
BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try using
urpmq --fuzzy name
Charles
Thanks Charles,
Now this is how it went,
first,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# rpm -qa | grep
John,
Looks like your gtk version is not upto date.
Tony.
-Original Message-
From: John Richard Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
FemmeFatale wrote:
At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote
Title: RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Richard Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
FemmeFatale wrote:
At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400
Title: RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
Dennis,
You
being in the military do you play Army Operations?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June
11, 2003 5:14 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
RE: [newbie] D4X Compile
-Original
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:51:15 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which still leaves me scratching my head, how to solve the gtk
dependency ?
It's some other gtk package ?
Actually the problem is that you have too much installed.
When you try to rebuild d4x it is linking to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Richard Smith
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] D4X Compile
FemmeFatale wrote:
At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
You
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:51:15 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which still leaves me scratching my head, how to solve the gtk
dependency ?
It's some other gtk package ?
Actually the problem is that you have too much installed.
When you try to
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:29:51 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you help me once more and give me the precise url for
d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm
ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/
or you ca use another mirror of your choice.
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:29:51 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you help me once more and give me the precise url for
d4x-2.4.1-2mdk.src.rpm
ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/
or you ca use another mirror of your choice.
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 12:26 pm, Tony S. Sykes wrote:
Dennis,
You being in the military do you play Army Operations?
humongous snip
No, sorry, I don't have the time. Full time job and full time Cabinetry and
repair business at home.
--
Dennis M. linux user #180842
Want to buy your Pack
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:59:18 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
so which packages do I need to complete the compile satisfactorilly.
I *think* you need to refer to it as gtk, not GTK, ie. it is case
sensitive.
Try this: rpm -qa | grep gtk
Most likely what you need is
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:59:18 +0100
John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so which packages do I need to complete the compile satisfactorilly.
You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel
BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try using
urpmq --fuzzy name
Charles
At 02:37 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, you wrote:
You need gtk+2.0, libgtk+2.0_0, and libgtk+2.0_0-devel
BTW, when you are nor sure of the package name try using
urpmq --fuzzy name
Charles
So thats what Fuzzy Does TY!!! omg the freaking INFO file sucks on
that one... i had a helluva time trying
24 matches
Mail list logo
