On Friday 04 February 2005 03:39 pm, Lanman wrote:
> Julie Sloan wrote:
> > On Friday 04 February 2005 09:58 am, Lanman wrote:
> >>Julie Sloan wrote:
> >>>On Friday 04 February 2005 05:15 am, et wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2005 09:16 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
> >On Thursday 03 February 200
Julie Sloan wrote:
On Friday 04 February 2005 09:58 am, Lanman wrote:
Julie Sloan wrote:
On Friday 04 February 2005 05:15 am, et wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2005 09:16 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2005 12:48 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Friday 04 February 2005 12:32 am, Aron Smi
On Friday 04 February 2005 09:58 am, Lanman wrote:
> Julie Sloan wrote:
> > On Friday 04 February 2005 05:15 am, et wrote:
> >>On Thursday 03 February 2005 09:16 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
> >>>On Thursday 03 February 2005 12:48 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Friday 04 February 2005 12:32 am, Aron S
Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Friday 04 February 2005 01:23 pm, Lanman wrote:
Personally, if I had to use the FUBAR howto, I'd rather just re-install.
It's less painful and allows me to get rid of unwanted stuff in the
process. Of course, I back up my important stuff everyday, just like
everyone else o
On Friday 04 February 2005 03:27 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Friday 04 February 2005 01:23 pm, Lanman wrote:
> > Personally, if I had to use the FUBAR howto, I'd rather just re-install.
> > It's less painful and allows me to get rid of unwanted stuff in the
> > process. Of course, I back up my i
On Friday 04 February 2005 01:23 pm, Lanman wrote:
> Personally, if I had to use the FUBAR howto, I'd rather just re-install.
> It's less painful and allows me to get rid of unwanted stuff in the
> process. Of course, I back up my important stuff everyday, just like
> everyone else on this list, r
Julie Sloan wrote:
On Friday 04 February 2005 05:15 am, et wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2005 09:16 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2005 12:48 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Friday 04 February 2005 12:32 am, Aron Smith wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2005 02:33 pm, Lanman wrote:
http://
On Friday 04 February 2005 05:15 am, et wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2005 09:16 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 February 2005 12:48 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> > > On Friday 04 February 2005 12:32 am, Aron Smith wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 03 February 2005 02:33 pm, Lanman wrote:
> > >
Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2005 10:33 pm, Lanman wrote:
Yo, Gang. I just found this site (in Canada of course! Grin!), which has
some very nice howto's on configuring a variety of Mandrake services and
applications. You might want to have a look. It seems to deal with
Mandrake 10
On Friday 04 February 2005 02:15 am, et wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2005 09:16 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 February 2005 12:48 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> > > On Friday 04 February 2005 12:32 am, Aron Smith wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 03 February 2005 02:33 pm, Lanman wrote:
> > >
On Thursday 03 February 2005 09:16 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2005 12:48 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> > On Friday 04 February 2005 12:32 am, Aron Smith wrote:
> > > On Thursday 03 February 2005 02:33 pm, Lanman wrote:
> > > > Yo, Gang. I just found this site (in Canada of course
On Thursday 03 February 2005 12:48 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Friday 04 February 2005 12:32 am, Aron Smith wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 February 2005 02:33 pm, Lanman wrote:
> > > Yo, Gang. I just found this site (in Canada of course! Grin!), which
> > > has some very nice howto's on configuring a
On Friday 04 February 2005 12:32 am, Aron Smith wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2005 02:33 pm, Lanman wrote:
> > Yo, Gang. I just found this site (in Canada of course! Grin!), which has
> > some very nice howto's on configuring a variety of Mandrake services and
> > applications. You might want to
On Thursday 03 February 2005 10:33 pm, Lanman wrote:
> Yo, Gang. I just found this site (in Canada of course! Grin!), which has
> some very nice howto's on configuring a variety of Mandrake services and
> applications. You might want to have a look. It seems to deal with
> Mandrake 10.0, but I susp
On Thursday 03 February 2005 02:33 pm, Lanman wrote:
> Yo, Gang. I just found this site (in Canada of course! Grin!), which has
> some very nice howto's on configuring a variety of Mandrake services and
> applications. You might want to have a look. It seems to deal with
> Mandrake 10.0, but I susp
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 09:24 pm, Bill Shirley wrote:
->nice -n -20 winex3 starcraft.exe
->
->(see 'nice --help')
->
->HTH,
->Bill
Okay, I put this in my starcraft.sh file and it gives me a permission denied
when I try to run it - it seems nice requires root privileges to do this. Any
ideas?
T
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 05:32 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
->Well, something's smelly here (no, not your feet); have you tried
->utilising "powertweak" to tickle some of the kernel params yet? And I'll
->assume you've tweaked your /etc/sysconfig/harddisks file as well, ya?
->
->stephen kuhn - propriet
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 09:24 pm, Bill Shirley wrote:
->nice -n -20 winex3 starcraft.exe
->
->(see 'nice --help')
->
->HTH,
->Bill
Thanks Bill, I looked at "man nice" and renice but overlooked --help. I'll see
if that does the trick.
(and thanks to everyone else who replied!)
--
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ronald J. Hall
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 5:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [newbie] nice/renice question
>
>
> On Tuesday 06 July 2004 02:44 pm, Greg Mey
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 19:07, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 July 2004 03:33 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
>
> ->I just realised something - have you tried tweaking out your WineX
> ->settings?
> ->
> ->stephen kuhn - proprietor
>
> I have played around with them a bit (what good are settings for
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 15:13, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> Okay, so I want to give a game on my sons comp *top* priorty when running.
> (I'm still trying to get better performance out of 10.0 here).
>
> How can I make a game like Starcraft, via winex3 or cedega run with a -20? It
> would be nice if it
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 01:13 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> Okay, so I want to give a game on my sons comp *top* priorty when running.
> (I'm still trying to get better performance out of 10.0 here).
>
> How can I make a game like Starcraft, via winex3 or cedega run with a -20?
> It would be nice if
Kristjan wrote:
Hi
I know it is possible, Only question remains. How?
I have a slow connection to the internet so I want to use it to the
maximum. But also so that when I want to download the new isos it will
not disturb surfing for my wife at the same time.
I use usually wget to fech the files.
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 09:44, Paul wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 15:28, HaywireMac wrote:
> > On 09 Sep 2003 22:52:31 -0700
> > Aron Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> >
> > > OTOH the Athalon chip in that thing runs so hot you don't need a
> > > furnace in the house.
> > > there is no such thin
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 05:28, HaywireMac wrote:
> On 09 Sep 2003 22:52:31 -0700
> Aron Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> > OTOH the Athalon chip in that thing runs so hot you don't need a
> > furnace in the house.
> > there is no such thing as global warming --just millions of 'puters
> > runn
> > > I do have a comcrap, so that may be why...
> >
> >
> OTOH the Athalon chip in that thing runs so hot you don't need a
> furnace in the house.
> there is no such thing as global warming --just millions of 'puters
> running win$ux on Athalon chips.
Athalon?!? This thing has a celery!
It ac
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 15:28, HaywireMac wrote:
> On 09 Sep 2003 22:52:31 -0700
> Aron Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> > OTOH the Athalon chip in that thing runs so hot you don't need a
> > furnace in the house.
> > there is no such thing as global warming --just millions of 'puters
> > runn
On 09 Sep 2003 22:52:31 -0700
Aron Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> OTOH the Athalon chip in that thing runs so hot you don't need a
> furnace in the house.
> there is no such thing as global warming --just millions of 'puters
> running win$ux on Athalon chips.
I thought is was all the cows f
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:01:46 -0700
Eric Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> I do have a comcrap, so that may be why...
--
HaywireMac
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: nodex.sytes.net
++
Mandrake HowTo's & More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
+
> However, I disagree with the info that Linux is hard to install. It's
> not. ML is very easy to install. Depending on the hardware one has,
> difficulties may come up, but that's another issue...
It can be easy, but we sure have seen a lot of people on here have
trouble.
For me, it installed gr
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 22:33:29 -0300
Josenildo Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
> Good one, Mac.
> However, I disagree with the info that Linux is hard to install. It's
> not. ML is very easy to install. Depending on the hardware one has,
> difficulties may come up, but that's another issue...
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 08:47, HaywireMac wrote:
> http://www.lysator.liu.se/~forsberg/linux/index.html
Good one, Mac.
However, I disagree with the info that Linux is hard to install. It's
not. ML is very easy to install. Depending on the hardware one has,
difficulties may come up, but that's anothe
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 08:57, Miark wrote:
> I have to say, the 9.1's packaging is much better looking than 9.0.
> Hopefully that compels a few more Wal-Mart shoppers etc. to pick it
> up and take a good look.
>
> http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/9.1/features/
>
> Miark
Hmmm...just wonder what the
On Sunday 18 November 2001 01:50, you wrote:
> > Basicly all Linux's will have 99.99% the same commands. Now going to
> > something like HP's Unix you will find that the commandline options are
> > different sometimes. I use HP Unix at work.
>
> I'm so sorry :)
>
really,,, you have all ou
> Basicly all Linux's will have 99.99% the same commands. Now going to
> something like HP's Unix you will find that the commandline options are
> different sometimes. I use HP Unix at work.
I'm so sorry :)
David E. F
ing in the next day or so I'll post it.
>From: Grant Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [newbie] Nice new NEWBIE website for Linux users
>Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:57:20 -0800
>
>So I realize that I'm
So I realize that I'm going to have to give up and learn the command line
stuff :(
Does each distro have a different set of commands?
What book or website would you recommend? Keep in mind I do know DOS.
Thank you, Grant
On November 16, 2001 05:34 am, you wrote:
> http://www.linux-tips.net/
>
That is pretty sweet!
You mentioned that there was a day version of this. Where
can I find that one?
Thanx!
tdh
--
T. Holmes
Unixtechs.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.unixtechs.org/
* Seth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001216 03:28]:
> SWEET!!
> I had the daylight version , I never knew a night one was made!
-michael- wrote:
>
> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights_dmsp_big.jpg
> --
> ~enjoy!~
> -michael-
That is f***ing spectacular!
--
Jay
~May the enemies of Ireland never meet a friend~
http://www.mrsnooky.com
SWEET!!
I had the daylight version , I never knew a night one was made!
Seth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of -michael-
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 2:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Nice?
http://antw
-michael- wrote:
>
> http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights_dmsp_big.jpg
> --
> ~enjoy!~
> -michael-
Hi, Michael,
Just had a look at that one, it is nice. Thanks Anthony Daniell
41 matches
Mail list logo
