Re: [newbie] Putting LM on for-sale computers

2002-02-05 Thread Randy Kramer
Franki wrote: > nope, not that I am aware of, linux is open source, so as long as you stick > with only open souce or equiv license, then you can load it on as many as > you like. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > My question, is there anything wrong with me putting LM on a

RE: [newbie] Putting LM on for-sale computers

2002-02-05 Thread Franki
nope, not that I am aware of, linux is open source, so as long as you stick with only open souce or equiv license, then you can load it on as many as you like. rgds Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nelson Bartley Sent: Tuesday, 5 Fe

Re: [newbie] Putting LM on for-sale computers

2002-02-04 Thread William R. Nash
Hello, Try look at the following links: i copy them from the Linux-mandrake 8.1 book. Original Copyright http://www.april.org/ http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html hope this help you. good question. Bill Nash - Original Message - From: "Nelson Bartley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Newbi

Re: [newbie] Putting LM on for-sale computers

2002-02-04 Thread Derek Jennings
On Monday 04 February 2002 21:36, Nelson Bartley wrote: > Heyo, > > I have a legal question to propose to the list experts. > > I currently run a computer company, and some of my clients are > interested in having LM or RedHat loaded on to their computers as > default, rather then pay 150$ for win

Re: [newbie] Putting LM on for-sale computers

2002-02-04 Thread shane
On Monday 04 February 2002 13:36, you spoke unto me thusly: > My question, is there anything wrong with me putting LM on a computer my > company is selling? Is there some form of royalty I should be concerned > about? I'm not required to have special permission am I? well this is not the answer