Re: [newbie] Shorewall vs. Bastille

2002-11-02 Thread Frans Ketelaars
I have Bastille-1.3.0-3mdk.noarch.rpm and Bastille-Tk-module-1.3.0-1.0.i386.rpm installed in ML9.0 and uninstalled shorewall. It works OK. On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 07:48:55 -0800 Myers, Dennis R NWO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So far Paul I can not get Bastille to run in 9.0, not even the latest and

Re: [newbie] Shorewall vs. Bastille

2002-11-02 Thread Dennis Myers
Ok, I was trying the newer 2.0 version, I'll give the older 1.3 a try, thanks for the info. On Saturday 02 November 2002 03:33 am, Frans Ketelaars wrote: I have Bastille-1.3.0-3mdk.noarch.rpm and Bastille-Tk-module-1.3.0-1.0.i386.rpm installed in ML9.0 and uninstalled shorewall. It works OK.

RE: [newbie] Shorewall vs. Bastille

2002-11-01 Thread Myers, Dennis R NWO
Title: RE: [newbie] Shorewall vs. Bastille So far Paul I can not get Bastille to run in 9.0, not even the latest and greatest, compiles to the end then says 9.0 is not currently supported. So Shorewall or IPCOP are your current choices. Shorewall is in there so that is the one I would try