u'r right jay.
what might be helpful is if someone could mail me a fairly standard
/etc/bashrc , bashprofile and /home/.bashrc, to see what it looks like and
does.
On Sunday 09 September 2001 11:55, you wrote:
The later version of bash does not mess up your bashrc, but it won't
restore
I can't find the original email sent on this topic, but it says that the
hostname was replaced with the bash-2.05$. Are you simply referring to
the prompt? Or is the hostname actually saying it's bash-2.05$?
As for the request for a standard /etc/skel/.bashrc and
/etc/skel/.bash_profile,
The later version of bash does not mess up your bashrc, but it won't restore
your lost one either, if I understand you correctly.
Jay
On Friday 07 September 2001 11:17, I was honored with this communique:
right, some more interesting facts i have just discovered:
i have lost the pretty
Does the user that you were loged in have permissons on his assigned home
directory?
The same happened to my a couple of days before, and I see in LunxConf that
the home directory of the user I was logging in was created by the root and
the user ddidn't have permissons . . .
Maybe it's just a
On Thursday 06 September 2001 13:38, you wrote:
Does the user that you were loged in have permissons on his assigned home
directory?
The same happened to my a couple of days before, and I see in LunxConf that
the home directory of the user I was logging in was created by the root and
the
