RE: [newbie] parport.o did not compile

2000-03-28 Thread Stephen Bosch
It seems silly that a basic component like parallel port support should be part of the kernel source, but I can't get the bloody thing to compile. That should read "shouldn't" =) No ideas yet? *sigh*

RE: [newbie] parport.o did not compile

2000-03-28 Thread Stephen Bosch
I'm probably not gonna be a lot of help since I haven't done the new kernel thing for a long time. However, as I recall, when you type 'make config' it gives you three choices for every option. y,n, or m. If you type 'n' then it doesn't make anything. You have to type in 'm' to specify

Re: [newbie] parport.o did not compile

2000-03-28 Thread Stephen F. Bosch
If I'm missing something specific in xconfig, I hope someone can point it out -- but I've been through it with a fine-toothed comb, I can't find anything that says "parallel port support" directly. Quoting myself... *sigh* Would the fact that I have configured parallel drive (e.g., Zip)

Re: [newbie] parport.o did not compile

2000-03-28 Thread Dan Ferris
Stephen Bosch wrote: I'm probably not gonna be a lot of help since I haven't done the new kernel thing for a long time. However, as I recall, when you type 'make config' it gives you three choices for every option. y,n, or m. If you type 'n' then it doesn't make anything. You have