Not entirely sure i know the problem, but check to see if there is
another header like "X-Apparently-To" or something like that.
eric
> FSCKING "" HEADERS!! Of course,
> procmail filters messages based on it's headers. But
> how can i filter messages that do not say where they are
> going? Such m
There is a frowned upon method where your ISP can dump all mail for a
domain into one account.
(actually, its as simple as this in the virtual file of postfix.)
somedomain.com virtual
@somedomain.com franki
And all mail for that domain goes to the one local account.
One of the X header
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:18:25PM +0200, Damian Gatabria wrote:
> Now, here's the one problem i need to solve:
> We also provide a domain name for them, as well as
> e-mail accounts. My boss wants to be able to use one
> single pop3 account in our main server to hand over the
> mail to this serv
El mié, 13-08-2003 a las 16:42, Frankie escribió:
> There is a frowned upon method where your ISP can dump all mail for a
> domain into one account.
>
> (actually, its as simple as this in the virtual file of postfix.)
>
> somedomain.comvirtual
> @somedomain.com franki
>
>
For now, i have managed to solve it with procmail. I just
made rules that search for valid local email addresses
in this form:
for\ \<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Since this 'for' line appears in the headers added by the mail server,
it seems to be working quite well, but if fetchmail can come
with a sim