>I am actually curious as to how someone without internet access
>is supposed to get this unlock code. has microsoft addressed this
You are offered the choice to register over the Internet, or read off
the code to MS over the phone, who will then read you out the activation
code, which you will
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sridhar Dhanapalan
Sent: 09 September 2001 04:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ah Pook
Subject: Re: FW: [newbie] OT: Win XP hacked already
On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 18:43:01 -0700, Ah Pook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 9/8/2001 7:18:43 AM, etharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 18:43:01 -0700, Ah Pook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 9/8/2001 7:18:43 AM, etharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >about a million people are going to tell you (and they are correct) that the
> >GIMP is every bit as good as photoshop, and they do not have the US gov. put
> >pe
9/8/2001 7:18:43 AM, etharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>about a million people are going to tell you (and they are correct) that the
>GIMP is every bit as good as photoshop, and they do not have the US gov. put
>people in jail for talking about how poor their encryption is under the DMCA.
On Saturday 08 September 2001 12:58, jennifer wrote:
> On Saturday 08 September 2001 11:56, richied wrote:
> > On September 8, 2001 09:42 am, Siavash Sefidvash wrote:
> > > Apologies for sounding naive, but is not fair to get paid for your
> > > efforts.?
> >
> > ...There's actually a bigger issue
On Saturday 08 September 2001 12:57 pm, Sridhar Dhanapalan escribió:
> Take a look at this article:
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2810195,00.html
>
> Here's an excerpt:
>
> "For those who haven't yet experienced it, the new scheme is
> concealed under the 'Product Activati
ED], richied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: FW: [newbie] OT: Win XP hacked already
>Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 12:58:30 -0400
>
>On Saturday 08 September 2001 11:56, richied wrote:
> > On September 8, 2001 09:42 am, Siavash Sefidvash wrote:
> > > Apologies for sounding naiv
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 12:58:30 -0400, jennifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 08 September 2001 11:56, richied wrote:
> > On September 8, 2001 09:42 am, Siavash Sefidvash wrote:
> > > Apologies for sounding naive, but is not fair to get paid for your
> > > efforts.?
> >
> > ...There's actua
On Saturday 08 September 2001 11:56, richied wrote:
> On September 8, 2001 09:42 am, Siavash Sefidvash wrote:
> > Apologies for sounding naive, but is not fair to get paid for your
> > efforts.?
>
> ...There's actually a bigger issue at stake. Win XP is actually taking a
> fingerpint of your syst
On September 8, 2001 09:42 am, Siavash Sefidvash wrote:
> Apologies for sounding naive, but is not fair to get paid for your
> efforts.?
...There's actually a bigger issue at stake. Win XP is actually taking a
fingerpint of your system. Your NIC, HDD, CD-ROM, CPU, etc all have unique
serial n
about a million people are going to tell you (and they are correct) that the
GIMP is every bit as good as photoshop, and they do not have the US gov. put
people in jail for talking about how poor their encryption is under the DMCA.
you might also consider that while dreamweaver sites appear ju
11 matches
Mail list logo
