Re: [newbie] lilo troubles (RH-related)

2003-03-26 Thread Raffaele Belardi
Thanks, this is very insteresting. I had assumed that multi-boot NT/linux could be done ony from lilo, now I learn that it can be done with the NT loader. Just one question on the dd command below: the first parameter in reality is if=/boot, right? raffaele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Raffaele,

Re: [newbie] lilo troubles (RH-related)

2003-03-26 Thread Leonardo Diciolla
Raffaele, sorry it was a mistake, the command is dd if=boot device* bs=512 count=1 of=linux.bin (*ie. /dev/xxx). I do have that configuration and it works fine. Actually you don't ever need lilo (unless you load initrd or are feeding kernel parameters).If this is your case just uninstall lilo

Re: [newbie] lilo troubles (RH-related)

2003-03-24 Thread Leonardo Diciolla
Raffaele, did you install lilo on your root / partition or on your master partition? Do you want to dual boot your machine or only mount your ntfs partition? If you want to mount it you have to compile the ntfs module at least and then go with modprobe or insmod. That doesn't depend upon Lilo.

Re: [newbie] lilo troubles (RH-related)

2003-03-24 Thread Raffaele Belardi
That's what I thought, and I did exactly as you write. But, running lilo to update the bootloader, we got the error message partition not found or something alike, and the bootloader was not changed. Thanks for the link, I was quite surprised seeing that ntfs is not included in RH. I guess MDK

Re: [newbie] lilo troubles (RH-related)

2003-03-24 Thread Raffaele Belardi
Leonardo, we installed lilo on the first sector of the /boot partition, as reccomended by the RH help for NT-linux coexistence on the same disk (in case of W95/98-linux coexistance it reccomended to put lilo in MBR instead), but I admit I did not understand why. What's this difference between