Hello mudder,
Friday, September 27, 2002, 9:06:06 PM, you wrote:
msn> I would also bet you burned them too fast. I've done this a time or two before.
msn> 4x burn is the safest bet. although I have had iso's burned at 6x and 8x
msn> work fine too.
msn> Mudder
yeah... all fixed, replace
On Friday 27 September 2002 06:49 am, Colin Jenkins wrote:
> msn> I would also bet you burned them too fast. I've done this a
> time or two before. msn> 4x burn is the safest bet. although I have
> had iso's burned at 6x and 8x msn> work fine too.
>just reburnt at 4x.. still the same...if I
Hello mudder,
Friday, September 27, 2002, 9:06:06 PM, you wrote:
msn> I concur,
msn> I would also bet you burned them too fast. I've done this a time or two before.
msn> 4x burn is the safest bet. although I have had iso's burned at 6x and 8x
msn> work fine too.
msn> Mudder
just reburnt
mber 2002 7:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: [newbie] mdk9.0
Hello mudder,
Friday, September 27, 2002, 9:06:06 PM, you wrote:
msn> I concur,
msn> I would also bet you burned them too fast. I've done this a time or two
before.
msn> 4x burn is the safest bet. although I
