On Sat, 2018-02-24 at 05:45 -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> On 2/24/18 5:18 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> > On 2/24/18 4:42 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> > > [top post for visibility]
> > >
> > > Says ntirpc pullup (twice), but doesn't actually have:
> > > * "Pullup NTIRPC throug
On 2/24/18 5:18 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
On 2/24/18 4:42 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
[top post for visibility]
Says ntirpc pullup (twice), but doesn't actually have:
* "Pullup NTIRPC through #106"
Missing "(nfs41.h) unindent" checkpatch cleanup, even though we'd
agreed this was
On 2/24/18 4:42 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
[top post for visibility]
Says ntirpc pullup (twice), but doesn't actually have:
* "Pullup NTIRPC through #106"
Missing "(nfs41.h) unindent" checkpatch cleanup, even though we'd
agreed this was the best time to do it, and it had all the expecte
[top post for visibility]
Says ntirpc pullup (twice), but doesn't actually have:
* "Pullup NTIRPC through #106"
Missing "(nfs41.h) unindent" checkpatch cleanup, even though we'd
agreed this was the best time to do it, and it had all the expected
+1 and +2. Literally no changes to running code,
