Hi,
I would actually prefer that we solve the issue with using the unbundled
libntirpc. That seems like the better long term solution, and one we
have to tackle anyway as we have a hard end date for using the bundled
libntirpc in Fedora and EPEL.
In the mean time I've reverted the EPEL 7 build (a
WRT $subject, we (Bill, Matt, DanG, and I) discussed decoupling ntiprc
from ganesha.
>From a packaging standpoint, it (version 1.2.1) is already unbundled in
Fedora and EPEL.
There are two patches (attached) that I used to accomplish this.
Patch 1 modifies the ntirpc cmake config to produce the
On 09/02/2015 02:10 PM, Matt Benjamin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've pushed 2 changes to the head of ntirpc duplex-12:
>
> 1. malahal's fix for Coverity CID 130080
> 2. a candidate change to implement shared-object versioning
>
> Kaleb, in particular, could you look over the versioning change and
> see h
Here's my thinking atm.
Currently what is shipping is:
F21: ganesha-2.1.0 w/ static, bundled libntirpc-1.1.0
F22: ganesha-2.2.0 w/ static, bundled libntirpc-1.2.1
F23: ganesha-2.2.0 w/ shared, unbundled libntirpc-1.2.1
F24: ganesha-2.2.0 w/ shared, unbundled libntirpc-1.2.1
EPEL6: ganesha-2.2.0 w
On 09/10/2015 06:47 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
> Could you push this patch to gerrithub?
>
yeah yeah. I had other things to do yesterday and ran out of time. But I
wanted to get it out there in case anyone thought it was urgent.
> Thanks
>
> Frank
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kaleb KEIT
Hi,
Okay, nfs-ganesha-2.3.0 and (lib)ntirpc-1.3.1 are packaged in Fedora
Rawhide (f24).
Fedora 23 is in freeze pending GA in a few days. After GA I propose to
update nfs-ganesha and libntirpc. I don't propose to update Fedora 22 or
Fedora 21. I will probably update Fedora 22 to 2.2.1 when that's
On 10/28/2015 02:55 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
> We have had various discussions over the years as to how to best handle out
> of memory conditions.
a) I see that, e.g., jemalloc's mallctl(3) has the ability to
selectively purge unused dirty pages from one or all arenas.
I don't know what that actuall
On 10/29/2015 08:29 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 10/28/2015 02:55 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
>> We have had various discussions over the years as to how to best handle out
>> of memory conditions.
>
> a) I see that, e.g., jemalloc's mallctl(3) has the ability to
> s
fine with me too
On 10/29/2015 01:38 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
> I'd like to see if we can move the conference call to Tuesday for the rest
> of the year.
>
> Thursday Nov 16 and Thursday Dec 2 I will likely be with my wife at the
> hospital with new baby related stuff. Thursday Nov 26 is Thanksgivi
On 11/18/2015 12:27 AM, Zheng Liu wrote:
> Hi Kaleb,
>
> I don't use rpm package to install nfs-ganesha. Actually I compile the
> nfs-ganesha manually. The steps are as below.
That's fine, then you are responsible for providing all the correct
dependencies.
>
> 1. wget http://web.mit.edu/ker
On 02/12/2016 01:36 PM, Christian Petersen wrote:
> I did another test by powering off a host. The cluster floating IPs went
> offline making the Ganesha share inaccessible. The nfs-grace error occurs on
> node 1 and node 3. The timeout time is set to 250 seconds just for good
> measure.
>
>
On 04/11/2016 02:06 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote:
>
>
> On 04/11/2016 06:41 AM, Varghese Devassy wrote:
>> Soumya,
>>
>> Are there any plans of adding these missing fixes into 2.2?
>
> I am not sure if V2.2 branch is still being actively supported. Request
> Malahal/Kaleb to comment.
>
AFAIK it's n
On 04/11/2016 09:38 AM, Tushar Shinde wrote:
> If 2.2 will be not maintained, which will be next stable release? I
> don't see any branch "V2.4-stable". Which will be the next LTS stable
> branch for NFS Ganesha?
2.3 is the current stable release. 2.4 is winding down to release soon,
probably in M
Forwarded Message
Subject: ABRT report for package nfs-ganesha has reached 100 occurrences
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 12:52:45 + (UTC)
From: notificati...@fedoraproject.org
To: kkeit...@redhat.com
Packages: nfs-ganesha
Function: raise
First occurrence: 2016-06-04
Type: cor
On 07/25/2016 09:52 AM, Swen Schillig wrote:
> I have a few mem-leak fixes for libntirpc discovered by valgrind.
>
> Is there a way I could "upstream" them from within our ganesha repo ?
>
> Sorry if that is already described somewhere else.
>
> Cheers Swen
https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ga
On 07/25/2016 10:47 AM, Swen Schillig wrote:
> On Mo, 2016-07-25 at 10:10 -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> On 07/25/2016 09:52 AM, Swen Schillig wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a few mem-leak fixes for libntirpc discovered by valgrind.
>>>
>>> Is there a way I
On 07/27/2016 11:54 AM, Frank Filz wrote:
>>> That is why we have the release_IP dBus command, it signals the
>>> Ganesha that is giving up clients to drop their locks.
>>
>> Thanks a lot Frank. Right now in our HA solution, we do not send any
> event.
>> So by default I guess it takes "EVENT_TAKE_
Forwarded Message
Subject:[Gluster-users] NFS-Ganesha lo traffic
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:03:52 +0300
From: Mahdi Adnan
To: gluster-us...@gluster.org
Hi,
Im using NFS-Ganesha to access my volume, it's working fine for now but
im seeing lots of traffic on t
On last week's community conference call we concluded that "nb_worker =
256" is a good starting point for enterprise, production use.
The default value of 16 is for good for developers, not much else.
Anyone may join the confcall
Weekly concall Tuesdays 8:30 AM PDT US: +1-866-951-1151 (meeting c
can tell. At least a `diff -r` of the
two tar files (untarred) doesn't show any diff.
> Matt
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY"
>> To: "Matt Benjamin"
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 7:53:12 AM
>> Subject
On 12/01/2016 12:29 PM, Ben Werthmann wrote:
> Hello Ganesha devs,
>
> Is there a blocker for Ubuntu Trusty (14.04)? Perhaps the thread 'assert
> in dec_state_owner_ref() with V2.4.0.3'? The libntirpc/nfs-ganesha PPAs
> for Trusty on Launchpad contain:
>
> libntirpc 1.3.1 / ganesha 2.3.3
>
> non-tr
Hi,
fsal-vfs is in the nfs-ganesha-fsal .deb along with all the other FSALs.
I'm not aware of any compatible builds of Ceph in Launchpad PPAs that
could be used to build fsal-ceph. Same goes for fsal-rgw.
On 12/02/2016 06:39 AM, Ramana Raja wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It'd be useful to have nfs-ganesha-v
Hi,
As discussed on the call yesterday (3 Jan) I have set up runs of the
Coverity tool on the next branch.
Results are posted to
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/nfs-ganesha/coverity/
The results from the initial run are available now at
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/nfs-ganes
On 01/17/2017 08:51 AM, Swen Schillig wrote:
> Hi Kaleb
>
> I heard you're the man if it comes to build/package ganesha for
> Ubuntu(Debian).
>
> Could you provide some more details on that,
> like repo, HowTos, etc.
>
> Thanks in advance for your support.
NFS-Ganesha and ntirpc for Ubuntu is in t
Forwarded Message
Subject:Ganesha logo / hex sticker
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:25:14 +
From: Tuomas Kuosmanen
To: Amye Scavarda
CC: Kaleb Keithley , Vijay Bellur
Hello all :-)
There was a discussion of a hexagonal Ganesha project sticker during
D
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
Nfs-ganesha-devel
On 03/08/2017 11:35 AM, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> Firefox works if you have a new enough version (I use 50.1.0, but
> supposedly 50.x or higher works). Alternatively, chrome works.
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
>> On 03/07/2017 08:46 AM, LUCAS Patrice wrote:
>>> Hi everyb
These are the changes proposed thus far. Thoughts? Any others we should
consider?
Fix-Coverity-CID-155159-Deadlock
commit a6636acb1448b3fa3330e5b7bd20afe7719e7a0f
Change-Id: I92023e942e8f9ade894d57dac9c0d48dc351b5a8
Reduce-and-mitigate-a-rename-readir-race-window
commit d8dbbcd66958acdb456e511eb
On 03/14/2017 11:49 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> These are the changes proposed thus far. Thoughts? Any others we should
> consider?
>
> Fix-Coverity-CID-155159-Deadlock
> commit a6636acb1448b3fa3330e5b7bd20afe7719e7a0f
> Change-Id: I92023e942e8f9ade894d57dac9c0d48dc351b5
On 03/15/2017 08:40 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 11:49 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> These are the changes proposed thus far. Thoughts? Any others we should
>> consider?
>>
>> Fix-Coverity-CID-155159-Deadlock
>> commit a6636acb1448b3fa3330
Hi,
Tag V2.4.4 has been made on the 2.4-stable branch.
It contains the following fixes since V2.4.3:
>
>>> Fix-Coverity-CID-155159-Deadlock
>>> commit a6636acb1448b3fa3330e5b7bd20afe7719e7a0f
>>> Change-Id: I92023e942e8f9ade894d57dac9c0d48dc351b5a8
>>>
>>> Reduce-and-mitigate-a-rename-readir-ra
Hi,
Since tagging V2.4.4 the following changes have been cherry-picked to
the 2.4-stable branch. Are there any others before I tag V2.4.5?
commit 1fe6d7699b32633f8d6e71436af645cdf813d90d
Author: Daniel Gryniewicz
Date: Thu Feb 9 14:39:08 2017 -0500
Remove PSEUDO directories on unexport
Also
commit e0602b00f056c00329e7f202c2385487a2a37d80
Author: Matt Benjamin
Date: Thu Feb 23 10:43:51 2017 -0500
RGW: enlighten rgw_lookup from readdir callbacks
In addition to the others previously called out below.
Anything else?
commit 1fe6d7699b32633f8d6e71436af645cdf813d90d
Autho
$subject.
--
Kaleb
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailin
The longevity cluster has been updated to glusterfs-3.10.1 (from 3.8.5).
General information on the longevity cluster is at [1].
In the previous update sharding was enabled on the gluster volume. This
time I have added a NFS-Ganesha NFS server on one server. Its memory
usage is being sampled a
We have nfs-ganesha-2.5rc2 packages for testing
https://kkeithle.fedorapeople.org/ganesha25.tgz
Includes libntirpc-1.5.0 rpms.
Use with glusterfs-3.10.1 rpms from CentOS Storage SIG.
For the truly bold, there are also nfs-ganesha-2.5rc2 and
libntirpc-1.5.0 RPMs in Fedora rawhide (f27)
--
Kal
On 04/24/2017 01:55 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> We have nfs-ganesha-2.5rc2 packages for testing
>
> https://kkeithle.fedorapeople.org/ganesha25.tgz
>
> Includes libntirpc-1.5.0 rpms.
>
> Use with glusterfs-3.10.1 rpms from CentOS Storage SIG.
That is, if you want to te
On 05/16/2017 10:15 AM, Supriti Singh wrote:
> I have another question. Why are we using the name "ganesha" and not the
> package name "nfs-ganesha" for the service file.
> It may happen that there is another package named "ganesha" (not yet but
> a possibility).
> Also, it will be better to have
FYI,
The glusterfs and nfs-ganesha longevity cluster has been updated to
glusterfs-3.11.0. (It continues to run nfs-ganesha-2.4.3 and
libntirpc-1.4.3)
Periodic sampling of the RSZ and VSZ of glusterd, glusterfsd, and
ganesha.nfsd on the servers, and glusterfs on the client are taken while
RPM and .deb packages of nfs-ganesha-2.5 are available for several
popular linux distributions:
* Packages are in Fedora 26 and Fedora 27/rawhide. Use `dnf install ...`
Packages will be in the Fedora 26 Updates-Testing repo for a short while
before being promoted to the Updates repo.
* Pac
On 06/15/2017 06:28 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>
> RPM and .deb packages of nfs-ganesha-2.5 are available for several
> popular linux distributions:
>
> * Packages are in Fedora 26 and Fedora 27/rawhide. Use `dnf install ...`
> Packages will be in the Fedora 26 Updates-Testin
https://kkeithle.fedorapeople.org/Debian.HOWTO
Install debuild, pbuilder, reprepro, etc., and generate a gpg key to
sign with. If you're not going to sign the files you can omit the -kfoo
and -k foo options.
clone g...@github.com:nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha-debian.git, checkout the
branch for yo
On 07/21/2017 06:30 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
Branch next
Tag:V2.5.1
Community packages of nfs-ganesha-2.5.1 for a several popular Linux
distributions are available.
For Fedora 26 and Fedora 27 (rawhide), packages are in the Updates or
UpdatesTesting repository. Use dnf to install or update.
In builds for Fedora, the Fedora rpmbuild configs override a lot of options.
Here's a typical nfs-ganesha compile line:
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/nfs-ganesha-2.5.1/src/Protocols/NFS &&
/usr/bin/cc -I/usr/include/glusterfs -I/usr/include/uuid
-I/builddir/build/BUILD/nfs-ganesha-2.5.1/src/include
On 08/23/2017 02:58 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
> Malahal pushed the commits for V2.5.2, but he didn't push a signed tag. In
> the interests of moving things along, I have pushed a signed tag for V2.5.2
Community packages of nfs-ganesha-2.5.2 are available for:
* Fedora 25 on download.gluster.org at [1
The longevity cluster has been updated to GlusterFS-3.12.1 and
NFS-Ganesha-2.5.2.
The cluster consists of eight servers, with an eight brick 4x2
distribute+replica volume, w/ sharding enabled.
NFS-Ganesha with FSAL_GLUSTER is running on the first server. Previously
ACLs had been disabled; now th
On 10/03/2017 02:31 AM, sriram patil wrote:
Hi,
AFAIK we can run only single instance of nfs-ganesha on a given
machine which supports dbus signals. Running with different ports, nfs
ganesha service comes up, but the dbus signals work only for the first
(primary) instance. We cannot interact wit
On 10/20/2017 01:32 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> + #if defined(_SC_IOV_MAX) /* IRIX, MacOS X, FreeBSD, Solaris, ... */
>> +- __svc_maxiov = sysconf(_SC_IOV_MAX);
>> ++ {
>> ++ /*
>> ++* some glibc (e.g. 2.26 in Fedora 27 beta) always
>> ++
On 01/05/2018 12:19 AM, Malahal Naineni wrote:
Hmm, you listed patches from very old tags as well. V2.5 should have
only patches that fix defects. We should NOT be adding new features,
clean up works etc from V2.6 to V2.5-stable. For example, you listed
gerrirt change-id . It
implemented a n
On 01/18/2018 03:23 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> (This is meant for the Fedora devel mailing list, but I've cc'd the
> nfs-ganesha mailing list in the hopes that they might see something I'm
> missing)
>
> The latest release of the LizardFS distributed filesystem includes a
> FSAL for NFS Ganesha,
On 01/18/2018 08:58 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 07:34 -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>> On 01/18/2018 03:23 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>>> What is the best way for me to include NFS Ganesha support in LizardFS?
>>>1. Include the latest Fedora
packages for Fedora-27, CentOS 7, Debian 9/stretch, and Debian 10/buster
can be found at
https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/nfs-ganesha/2.6/2.6rc3/
Packages are also available for Fedora-28/rawhide. Use dnf to install.
Packages are signed. The pubkey is at
https://download.gluster.org/
On 01/31/2018 10:21 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> On 1/30/18 12:03 PM, Supriti Singh wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> As discussed in community call, I am sharing the feature board list:
>> https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/projects for nfs-ganesha
>> 2.6 and 2.7. The aim is to use these bo
On 02/09/2018 10:28 AM, You Me wrote:
> I compiled ganesha 2.5.1 from sources. 'make rpm' gave me all RPMs
> except ganesha-utils.
> How do I build that one?
>
Are you aware that we provide "community packages" for a number of
popular platforms: Fedora, RHEL/CentOS, Debian, Ubuntu, SLES, and
Open
As a convenience, packages of NFS-Ganesha-2.6.0 and libntirpc for
several popular Linux distributions are available:
Fedora 27 x86_64 (and aarch64 soon) at [1]. Fedora 28 and 29/rawhide are
in Fedora Updates or Updates-Testing' use dnf to install.
CentOS Storage SIG el6 and el7. Packages are cur
On 03/06/2018 12:20 PM, Pradeep wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there plans to implement multiprotocol (NFS and CIFS accessing same
> export/share) in ganesha?
CIFS* _in_ ganesha? No.
There is on-going work being done to make leases, delegations, and ACLs
work consistently and reliably between nfs-ganes
k - will keep you posted.
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:33 AM, Szymon Haly
> mailto:szymon.h...@skytechnology.pl>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Kaleb,
>
> Thanks so much for an awesome time. I forwarded your email to
> the team and we will pr
I've grown to prefer building RPMs (or to a lesser extent .debs).
Dependencies (RPM BuildRequires: or dpkg Build-Depends:) are explicitly
named. If you don't have them installed, you can't build.
Any magic steps that are necessary are documented in the packaging
file(s); you don't have to remember
On 03/20/2018 10:09 AM, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> I'd like to announce the release of the latest stable version of Ganesha:
> 2.6.1
>
As a convenience, "community" packages of nfs-ganesha-2.6.1, including
(lib)ntirpc-1.6.2, are provided in or for the following Linux distributions:
* Fedora 28
FYI——
SEGV when parsing a bad ganesha.conf.
This is version 2.4.5 (!!!) from the CentOS Storage SIG.
core and config files are not available. :-(
Forwarded Message
Subject: ABRT report for package nfs-ganesha has reached 10 occurrences
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:20:39 + (
On 03/26/2018 12:30 PM, Frank Filz wrote:
>> FYI——
>>
>> SEGV when parsing a bad ganesha.conf.
>>
>> This is version 2.4.5 (!!!) from the CentOS Storage SIG.
>>
>> core and config files are not available. :-(
>
> Any way we can figure out the config that caused this?
Er, no.
> Who ran this test
This list has been deprecated. Please subscribe to the new devel list at
lists.nfs-ganesha.org.
The NFS-Ganesha mailing lists are migrating to new lists hosted on the
new nfs-ganesha.org mail server.
The old lists on SourceForge will be retired later this year.
Please go to lists.nfs-ganesha
62 matches
Mail list logo
